Antiracism: An Ethical Imperative

Author:

Wolfe Ian12,Moore Bryanna3,Bush Lynn45,Knackstedt Angela6,Derrington Sabrina78,Hoehn K. Sarah9,Johnson Liza-Marie10,Porter Sarah1112,Brown Amy Caruso1314

Affiliation:

1. aClinical Ethics Department, Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

2. bCenter for Bioethics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

3. cInstitute for Bioethics and Health Humanities, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

4. dBoston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

5. eHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

6. fChildren’s Mercy Bioethics Center, Kansas City, Missouri

7. gChildren’s Hospital Los Angeles Center for Bioethics, Los Angeles, California

8. hKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

9. iDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

10. jSt. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee

11. kRandall Children’s Hospital, Portland, Oregon

12. lPortland State University, Portland, Oregon

13. mCenter for Bioethics and Humanities

14. nDepartment of Pediatrics, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York

Abstract

Pediatric ethicists hold a privileged position of influence within health care institutions. Such a position confers a corresponding responsibility to address barriers to the health and flourishing of all children. A major barrier to children’s health is racism. Pediatric ethicists can, and should, leverage their position to address racism both in institutional policy and the provision of pediatric care. Health care’s historical and continued contributions to fostering and sustaining racist values and systems mean that those within all medical fields— regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, age, or profession—should consider ways they can work to offset and ultimately dismantle those values and systems. Institutional policy is a critical mechanism propagating racism in hospitals and an area where ethicists have a unique perspective to bring antiracism into ethical analysis. Many institutional and organizational policies have unintended consequences, negatively impacting children and families who have been historically marginalized and oppressed. In this paper, we report and discuss existing policies, along with how they are implemented (procedures) and how they are conducted (practices), identified through a workshop during a pediatric subgroup meeting at an annual bioethics conference. We highlight the need to focus on these structural factors and reference scholarship that can be used to correct institutional policies that uphold white supremacy. We conclude with actionable, concrete recommendations for change.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3