Race-Conscious Research Using Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Data: A Narrative Review

Author:

Moynihan Katie M.1234ORCID,Sharma Meesha5,Mehta Anuj67,Lillie Jon8,Ziegenfuss Marc910,Festa Marino1112,Chan Titus13,Thiagarajan Ravi1234

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Sandra L. Fenwick Institute for Pediatric Health Equity and Inclusion, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Children’s Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

5. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Benioff Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California

6. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado

7. Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado

8. Pediatric Intensive Care, Evelina London Children’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom

9. Adult Intensive Care Services, Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland Intensive Care Clinical Network and State Emergency Coordination Centre, Brisbane, Australia

10. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS), Australia

11. New South Wales Kids ECMO Referral Service, Australia

12. Kids Critical Care Research, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

13. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Abstract

Race-conscious research identifies health disparities with 1) rigorous and responsible data collection, 2) intentionality and considered analyses, and 3) interpretation of results that advance health equity. Individual registries must overcome specific challenges to promote race-conscious research, and this paper describes ways to achieve this with a focus on the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. This article reviews ELSO registry publications that studied race with outcomes to consider whether research outputs align with race-conscious concepts and describe the direction of associations reported. Studies were identified via secondary analysis of a comprehensive scoping review on ECMO disparities. Of 32 multicenter publications, two (6%) studied race as the primary objective. Statistical analyses, confounder adjustment, and inclusive, antibiased language were inconsistently used. Only two (6%) papers explicitly discussed mechanistic drivers of inequity such as structural racism, and five (16%) discussed race variable limitations or acknowledged unmeasured confounders. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry publications demonstrated more adverse ECMO outcomes for underrepresented/minoritized populations than non-ELSO studies. With the objective to promote race-conscious ELSO registry research outputs, we provide a comprehensive understanding of race variable limitations, suggest reasoned retrospective analytic approaches, offer ways to interpret results that advance health equity, and recommend practice modifications for data collection.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Equitable Health Care for Children;Journal of the American College of Cardiology;2024-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3