Electronic Documentation in Pediatrics: The Rationale and Functionality Requirements

Author:

O’Donnell Heather C.12,Suresh Srinivasan3,Webber Emily Chui,Alexander Gregg M.,Chung Sandy Lee,Hamling Alexander M.,Kirkendall Eric S.,Mann Ann M.,Sadeghian Reza,Shelov Eric,Wiesenthal Andrew M.,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York;

2. Pediatric Physicians’ Organization at Children’s Hospital, Boston Children’s Hospital, Brookline, Massachusetts; and

3. Divisions of Health Informatics and Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Abstract

Clinical documentation has dramatically changed since the implementation and use of electronic health records and electronic provider documentation. The purpose of this report is to review these changes and promote the development of standards and best practices for electronic documentation for pediatric patients. In this report, we evaluate the unique aspects of clinical documentation for pediatric care, including specialized information needs and stakeholders specific to the care of children. Additionally, we explore new models of documentation, such as shared documentation, in which patients may be both authors and consumers, and among care teams while still maintaining the ability to clearly define care and services provided to patients in a given day or encounter. Finally, we describe alternative documentation techniques and newer technologies that could improve provider efficiency and the reuse of clinical data.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference70 articles.

1. The Free Dictionary by Farlex. Medical dictionary. Available at: http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com. Accessed August 20, 2018

2. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians;Kuhn;Ann Intern Med,2015

3. A qualitative analysis evaluating the purposes and practices of clinical documentation;Ho;Appl Clin Inform,2014

4. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology . Strategy on reducing regulatory and administrative burden relating to the use of health IT and EHRs. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/webform/reducing_burden_report/draft-strategy-on-reducing-regulatory-and-administrative-burden-relating---rkb-comments.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2019

5. Physicians’ attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing;O’Donnell;J Gen Intern Med,2009

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3