Quality Indicators for Youth Transitioning to Adult Care: A Systematic Review

Author:

Bailey Katherine12,Lee Stephanie34,de Los Reyes Thomas156,Lo Lisha7,Cleverley Kristin189,Pidduck Jacklynn10,Mahood Quenby11,Gorter Jan Willem12131415,Toulany Alene116

Affiliation:

1. aTemerty Faculty of Medicine

2. bInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation

3. fDepartment of Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

4. gDepartment of Adolescent Medicine, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

5. cDepartment of Urology

6. kDepartments of Urology

7. dCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

8. eLawrence S. Bloomberg School of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. hMargaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth & Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. iIWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

11. jHospital Library

12. mDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports

13. nCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands

14. oCanChild, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

15. pDe Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands

16. lAdolescent Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Transition from pediatric to adult care is associated with adverse health outcomes for many adolescents with chronic illness. We identified quality indicators for transition to adult care that are broadly applicable across chronic illnesses and health systems. METHODS Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched, covering earliest available date to July 2021. The Gray Matters framework was used to search gray literature. Two independent reviewers screened articles by title and abstract, followed by full-text review. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Studies were included that identified quality indicators developed via consensus-building methods. Indicators were organized into a framework categorized by illness specificity, level of care, Donabedian model, and Institute of Medicine quality domain. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool was used for critical appraisal. RESULTS The search identified 4581 articles, of which 321 underwent full-text review. Eight peer-reviewed studies and 1 clinical guideline were included, identifying 169 quality indicators for transition. Of these, 56% were illness specific, 43% were at the patient level of care, 44% related to transition processes, and 51% were patient centered and 0% equity focused. Common indicator themes included education (12%), continuity of care (8%), satisfaction (8%), and self-management/self-efficacy (7%). The study was limited by quality indicators developed through consensus-building methodology. CONCLUSIONS Although most quality indicators for transition were patient-centered outcomes, few were informed by youth and parents/caregivers, and none focused on equity. Further work is needed to prioritize quality indicators across chronic illness populations while engaging youth and parents/caregivers in the process.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3