Modeling the Impact of Formal and Informal Supports for Young Children With Disabilities and Their Families

Author:

Bailey Donald B.1,Nelson Lauren2,Hebbeler Kathy3,Spiker Donna3

Affiliation:

1. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

2. FPG Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

3. SRI International, Menlo Park, California

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to examine factors related to perceived impact of early intervention on children with disabilities and their families. METHODS. A nationally representative sample of ∼2100 parents completed a 40-minute telephone interview near their child's third birthday. Structural equation modeling examined the relationships between 3 support variables (quality of child services, quality of family services, and family/community support) and 2 outcomes at 36 months (impact on child and impact on family) and determined whether these relationships were mediated by 2 perceptual variables (optimism and confidence in parenting) or moderated by 5 demographic variables (poverty, maternal education, ethnicity, age of initial Individual Family Service Plan, and health at 36 months). RESULTS. Perceived impact of early intervention on both child and family were significantly related to each other. The quality of child services was related to impact on the child but not on the family. The quality of family services was related to both child and family impact. Informal support was not related to perceived impact on children or families but was strongly related to confidence in parenting and optimism. Neither optimism nor confidence in parenting mediated the relationships between services or supports and perceived impact. Minority families and families of children with poor health reported lower quality of services, but these characteristics did not moderate the relationships between services and perceived impact on the child. However, both poverty status and minority status were associated with perceptions of impact on the family. CONCLUSIONS. Findings reinforce the role of high-quality services in maximizing perceived impact. They also highlight the important role of informal support in promoting optimism and confidence in parenting. Poverty status, minority status, and poor health of the child are salient factors in predicting lower perceived quality of and benefit from services.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference43 articles.

1. Guralnick MJ, ed. The Effectiveness of Early Intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1997

2. Guralnick MJ, ed. The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2005

3. Bailey DB, Skinner D, Warren SF. Newborn screening for developmental disabilities: reframing presumptive benefit. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1889–1893

4. Bailey DB, Bruer JT, Symons FJ, Lichtman JW, eds. Critical Thinking About Critical Periods. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2001

5. Greenough W, Black J, Wallace C. Experience and brain development. Child Dev. 1987;58:539–559

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3