How Children With Special Needs Travel With Their Parents: Observed Versus Reported Use of Vehicle Restraints

Author:

Korn Taube12,Katz-Leurer Michal1,Meyer Shirley1,Gofin Rosa2

Affiliation:

1. Alyn Hospital, Pediatric and Adolescent Rehabilitation Center, Jerusalem, Israel

2. Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine of the Hebrew University and Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The difficulties entailed in transporting children with special physical and behavioral needs could influence child restraint misuse and nonuse within this population. Although parental interview is often used to assess child vehicle restraint use, little research had been performed to validate this approach, and none has been done in the special-needs population. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of nonuse and misuse of child restraints in the special-needs population and to assess the validity of using parental report as a measure of child restraint use. METHODS. Restraint use in 115 children with special needs, aged 0 to 18 years, was observed on their arrival at the parking lot of the Alyn Hospital Pediatric Rehabilitation Center in Jerusalem. The observation noted type of restraint used or absence thereof. If a restraint was used, correct use/misuse was recorded. In 94 cases, the parents were interviewed later that day in the clinic. RESULTS. Seventy percent of the children were observed as traveling unrestrained or with a restraint that was grossly misused to the extent that it provided no meaningful protection. The remaining children were observed displaying a variety of errors in the selection or use of the restraint that compromised their safety to varying degrees. Analysis of the observation results versus parental reporting revealed a 44% overreporting of child restraint use. Sensitivity was 71%, and specificity was 86%. CONCLUSIONS. The high prevalence of restraint nonuse and misuse within the special-needs population defines this as a population at risk and emphasizes the need for intervention. Cautious interpretation is required of information acquired from parental reporting of child restraint use. The results of this study should raise awareness among professionals working with children with special needs as to the need for tailored assessment and intervention in the area of child-passenger safety.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference27 articles.

1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program [instructor manual]. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2004

2. Decina LE, Lococo KH. Misuse of Child Restraints. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration; 2004

3. Glassbrenner D. The Use of Child Restraints in 2002; Research Note (DOT HS 555). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2003

4. Anund A, Falkmer T, Forsman A, et al. Child Safety in Cars: Literature Review. Linkoping, Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute; 2003. VTI rapport 489A

5. Paley K, Walker JL, Cromwell F, Enlow C. Transportation of children with special needs. South Med J.1993;86:1339–1341

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3