Rethinking Well-Child Care in the United States: An International Comparison

Author:

Kuo Alice A.1,Inkelas Moira2,Lotstein Debra S.1,Samson Kyra M.1,Schor Edward L.3,Halfon Neal12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Mattel Children’s Hospital at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

2. UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California

3. Commonwealth Fund, New York, New York

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The increasing scope of health supervision recommendations challenges well-child care delivery in the United States. Comparison of the United States with other countries’ delivery systems may highlight different assumptions as well as structural approaches for consideration. OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to describe the process of well-child care delivery in industrialized nations and compare it to the US model of child health care. METHODS. Literature reviews and international experts were used to identify 10 countries with unique features of well-child care delivery for comparison to the United States. Key-informant interviews using a structured protocol were held with child health experts in 10 countries to delineate the structural and practice features of their systems. Site visits produced additional key informant data from 5 countries (Netherlands, England, Australia, Sweden, and France). RESULTS. A primary care framework was adapted to analyze structural and practice features of well-child care in the 10 countries. Although well-child care content is similar, there are marked differences in the definitions of well-child care and the scope of practice of primary care professionals and pediatricians specifically who provide this care across the 10 countries. In contrast to the United States, none of the countries place all well-child care components under the responsibility of a single primary care provider. Well-child care services and care for acute, chronic, and behavioral/developmental problems are often provided by different clinicians and within different service systems. CONCLUSIONS. Despite some similarities, well-child care models from other countries differ from the United States in key structural features on the basis of broad financing differences as well as specific visions for effective well-child care services. Features of these models can inform child health policy makers and providers in rethinking how desired improvements in US well-child care delivery might be sought.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference18 articles.

1. Markel H. For the welfare of children. In: Stern AM, Markel H, eds. Formative Years: Children’s Health in the United States, 1880-2000. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 2000:47–65

2. Schor EL. Rethinking well-child care. Pediatrics. 2004;114:210–216

3. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Children’s Health, the Nation’s Wealth: Assessing and Improving Child Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004

4. Halfon N, Hochstein M. Life course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Q. 2002;80:433–479

5. Green M, Palfrey JS, eds. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3