Author:
Strøyer de Voss Sarah,Wilson Philip Michael John,Kirk Ertmann Ruth,Overbeck Gritt
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Family psychosocial challenges during the early years of a child’s life are associated with later mental and physical health problems for the child. An increased psychosocial focus on parents in routine child developmental assessments may therefore be justified.
Methods
Participants in this qualitative study included 11 mothers and one parental couple (mother and father) with children aged 9–23 months. Participants were recruited to Project Family Wellbeing through their general practice in Denmark. Twelve interviews were conducted, transcribed and analysed with a deductive approach. The topic guide drew on the core components of the Health Belief Model, which also served as a framework for the coding that was conducted using thematic analysis.
Results
Results are presented in four themes and 11 subthemes in total. Parents welcome discussion of their psychosocial circumstances during their child’s developmental assessments. Clinicians’ initiatives to address psychosocial challenges and alignment of parents’ and clinicians’ expectations may be required to allow this discussion. A flowing conversation, an open communication style and a trustful relationship facilitate psychosocial discussion. Barriers included short consultation time, concerns about how information was used and when parents found specific psychosocial aspects stigmatising or irrelevant to discuss.
Conclusion
Enquiry about the family’s psychosocial circumstances in routine developmental assessments is acceptable among parents. Alignment of clinical and parental expectations of developmental assessments could facilitate the process. Future research should examine the predictive validity of the various components of developmental assessments.
Trial registration
This is a qualitative study. The study participants are part of the cohort from Project Family Wellbeing (FamilieTrivsel). The project’s trial registry number: NCT04129359. Registered October 16th 2019.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Zeanah CJ, Zeanah PD. Infant mental health: the science of early experience. In: Zeanah CJ, editor. Handbook of infant mental health. 4th ed. New York: The Guilford; 2019. pp. 5–24.
2. Caspi A, Houts RM, Belsky DW, Harrington H, Hogan S, Ramrakha S, et al. Childhood forecasting of a small segment of the population with large economic burden. Nat Hum Behav. 2016;1:0005.
3. van Ijzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Duschinsky R, Fox NA, Goldman PS, Gunnar MR, et al. Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children: 1. A systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(8):703–20.
4. Goldfeld S, Yousafzai A. Monitoring tools for child development: an opportunity for action. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(3):232–3.
5. Vitaro F, Tremblay RE. Clarifying and maximizing the usefulness of targeted preventive interventions. In: Rutter M, Bishop DVM, Pine DS, Scott S, Stevenson J, Taylor E, Thapar A, editors. Rutter’s child and adolescent Psychiatry. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2008. pp. 989–1008.