1. American Evaluation Association. (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators. Washington, DC: American Evaluation Association.
2. American Statistical Association. (2014). Statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Retrieved from www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/ASA_VAM_Statement.pdf
3. Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Rethinking value-added models in education: Critical perspectives on tests and assessment-based accountability. New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Collins, C. (2012). The SAS Education Value-Added Assessment System (SAS EVAAS) in the Houston Independent School District (HISD): Intended and unintended consequences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(12). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1096
5. Baker, B. D., Oluwole, J. O., & Green, P. C. (2013). The legal consequences of mandating high-stakes decisions based on low quality information: Teacher evaluation in the race-to-the-top era. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(5), 1–71.