Animal welfare chauvinism in Brexit Britain: a genealogy of care and control

Author:

Message ReubenORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper uses the deployment of animal welfare as an issue during the ‘Brexit’ referendum as a lens through which to explore the mutual shaping of discourses about care for animals in Britain and the British nation, or the nationalism of animal welfare. Adopting a genealogical outlook, it uses one political advertisement in particular—paid for by the official Vote Leave campaign—as a focalising image and means of opening up the issues, leading to an empirical emphasis on the issue of live animal export as it has mediated ideas about Europe and British identity. Introducing the idea of ‘animal welfare chauvinism’, the paper suggests that animal welfare messages in the context of this constitutional debate were products of chauvinistic and caring impulses which are mutually constitutive and crystallised through discourses formed in relation to contingent historical struggles. Analytically, stress is placed on the constructive role of situated and repeated discursive exchanges, occurring between animal advocates and other national political elites, within which ‘care for animals’ as a national ideal is forged. In this light, the article concludes with reflections on the stakes of entering into an already existing conversation on the ‘national culture of care’ for animals in Britain.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference99 articles.

1. Abulafia, D. 2015. Britain: Apart from or a part of Europe? https://www.historytoday.com/britain-apart-or-part-europe. Accessed 27 Feb 2020.

2. Allen, L. 2019. Opinion: How the UK could use Brexit to finally end the cruel foie gras industry. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/foie-gras-ban-new-york-animal-cruelty-uk-eu-food-rights-a8771086.html. Accessed 29 May 2019.

3. Analysis. 2018. British politics: A Russian view. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0b91w19. Accessed 2 June 2019.

4. Andersen, J.G., and T. Bjørklund. 1990. Structural changes and new cleavages: The progress parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociologica 33 (3): 195–217.

5. Anderson, B. 2006. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3