Affiliation:
1. Institute of Political Science, University of Aarhus
2. Institute for Social Research, Oslo
Abstract
The Progress parties have been variously dubbed 'flash party, protest party', 'tax-revolt party', petty bourgeois protest movement populist party, 'extreme right-wing party' None of these labels passess unambrguously through a critical examination More recently, commentators have some times referred to the Progress parties as conventional bourgeois parties. Such a label is however. also problematic, as the social background or class profile of both parties shows an increasing dewaUun from conventional bourgeois parties Our approach is that the Progress parties must be inter preted in connection with the new cleavages in postindustral society We discuss the Progress parties in relation to cleavages emanating from the welfare state, and in particular to postindustrial materialism and the changed role of the working class
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference53 articles.
1. The Norwegian parliamentary election of 1989
2. Andersen, J Goul 1984 Aspekter af den politiske kultur Danmark efter 1970. In E. Damgaard (red ), Dansk denzokrait under forandring, Kbh Schultz, pp 17-49.
3. ?Environmentalism?, ?New Politics? and Industrialism: Some Theoretical Perspectives
Cited by
207 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献