The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information

Author:

Wadmann SarahORCID,Hartlev Mette,Hoeyer Klaus

Abstract

AbstractHealth data can contain sensitive information. People who consult a doctor seek help on issues that matter to them: they typically expect some form of confidentiality. However, the notion and practices of confidentiality have changed dramatically over time. In this article, we trace the history of confidentiality in the Danish healthcare system, which has one of the world’s most integrated patient information infrastructures. Building on an analysis of legal and political documents dating back to the late seventeenth century, we show that confidentiality originated as a social phenomenon that helped build trust in healthcare professionals and gradually developed into an idiom of citizens rights. Lately, confidentiality has given way to more technocratic forms of data protection. As the political, legal and technological reality, which the idea of confidentiality once referred to, has radically changed, we argue that confidentiality has become what Ulrik Beck has called a ‘zombie category’—a notion that lives on even if its content has passed away. If confidentiality has become a zombie concept, we suggest it is time to discuss what may take its place so that patient interests are protected in the current political economy of health data.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference103 articles.

1. Amoore, L. 2019. Doubt and the algorithm: On the partial accounts of machine learning theory. Culture and Society 36 (6): 147–169.

2. Article 29 Working Party. 2018. Guidelines on Consent under Regulation 2016/679.

3. Backer, K.H., and A. Skovgaard. 1949. LOV nr. 72 af 14. marts 1934 om Udøvelse af Lægegerning med kommentarer og henvisninger. I: K. H. Backer and A. Skovgaard (eds.) Social-Medicinske Love. Udvalgte og bearbejdede med henblik på deres betydning i social-medicinsk praksis. Copenhagen: Forlaget for Videnskabelig Litteratur.

4. Bauer, S. 2014. From administrative infrastructure to biomedical resource: Danish population registries, the ‘Scandinavian laboratory’, and the ‘epidemiologist’s dream.’ Science in Context 27 (2): 187–213.

5. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3