Abstract
AbstractThe article compares three influential theories used in sociology and psychology to categorize types of morality—Luc Boltanski & Laurent Thévenot’s justification theory, Shalom H. Schwartz’s basic human values theory, and Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory—to simplify the complexity presented by three different categorizations, while retaining necessary nuance, and to translate the concepts of each into the language of the other two. A comparative table is presented to evaluate which categories of the three theories correspond to each other and where do theories make distinctions that are lacking from the other two. This summary framework of Comparative Moral Principles (CMP) consists of eight principles to compare, explain, and interpret practices of moral motivation and meaning-making: Liberty, Inspiration, Safety, Community, Care, Equality, Deservingness, and Competition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference51 articles.
1. Andersen JG, Bjørklund T (1990) Structural changes and new cleavages: the progress parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociologica 33(3):195–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939003300303
2. Atari M, Haidt J, Graham J, Koleva S, Stevens ST, Dehghani M (2022) Morality beyond the WEIRD: how the nomological network of morality varies across cultures [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q6c9r
3. Bellah RN, Madsen R, Sullivan WM, Swidler A, Tipton SM (1985) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. University of California Press
4. Berlin I (2001) My intellectual path. In: Hardy H (ed). In Isaiah Berlin, the power of ideas. Princeton University Press. p 1–23
5. Boltanski L, Thévenot L (1999) The sociology of critical capacity. Eur J Soc Theor 33(10):928–940
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献