Abstract
AbstractA cursory inquest into the effects of SARS-CoV-2 exposes how easily the ramification of the pandemic has moved over from the physio-social to the psychosocial state of humans all over the world. Derogatory nomenclatures such as ‘Chinese-virus’ or ‘Corona-jihad’ can be seen as a part of a disjunctive politics of ‘representation’ as opposed to ‘representing’ with a metonymic effect. Such politics violates the protocol on naming new human infectious diseases set by World Health Organization. It also insinuates a long-term socio-political impression on the mental state of an individual or a social group, which may have an emasculating effect on the global solidarity to fight the virus. This calls for a nuanced psychosocial investigation with a specific analysis of how the ensuing stigmatization and fear can aggravate the contagion. With specific reference to the Indian sub-continent, this paper explains the socio-political orientation behind the essentialisation of a religious group that has led to the indictment of the minority community. By using Wagner’s theory of essentialisation and Critical Race Theory, this article shall endeavor to explore how media may play a crucial role in stigmatizing communities. Secondly, the paper also argues that the spiraling effect of such ostracisation leads to stigma and fear within the group which is not only dehumanizing but also detrimental to the concerted effort to contain the pandemic.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference102 articles.
1. Abrams D (2010) Processes of Prejudice: Theory, Evidence and Intervention. Centre for the Study of Group Process, University of Kent. www.equalityhumanrights.com
2. Adamczyk A, Freilich JD, Kim. C (2017) Religion and crime: a systematic review and assessment of next steps. Sociol Religion 78(2):192–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx012
3. Agadullina E, Lovakov A (2017) Understanding entitativity: are there real differences between approaches? Psychology https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2017-3-536-554
4. Airhihenbuwa CO (1995) Health and culture: beyond the western paradigm. Sage, Thousand Oaks. New Delhi
5. Airhihenbuwa CO, Iwelunmor JI (2012) Why Culture Matters in reducing the dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases: linking non-communicable and communicable diseases. The Commonwealth Health Ministers Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.chpa.co/Documents/WhyCultureConnects-DrAirhuhenbuwa.pdf. Accessed 11 Sep 2020
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献