Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?
-
Published:2020-01-13
Issue:1
Volume:6
Page:
-
ISSN:2055-1045
-
Container-title:Palgrave Communications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Palgrave Commun
Author:
Bammer GabrieleORCID, O’Rourke MichaelORCID, O’Connell Deborah, Neuhauser Linda, Midgley Gerald, Klein Julie Thompson, Grigg Nicola J.ORCID, Gadlin Howard, Elsum Ian R.ORCID, Bursztyn MarcelORCID, Fulton Elizabeth A., Pohl Christian, Smithson Michael, Vilsmaier Ulli, Bergmann Matthias, Jaeger Jill, Merkx Femke, Vienni Baptista Bianca, Burgman Mark A., Walker Daniel H., Young John, Bradbury Hilary, Crawford Lynn, Haryanto BudiORCID, Pachanee Cha-aim, Polk Merritt, Richardson George P.
Abstract
AbstractExpertise in research integration and implementation is an essential but often overlooked component of tackling complex societal and environmental problems. We focus on expertise relevant to any complex problem, especially contributory expertise, divided into ‘knowing-that’ and ‘knowing-how.’ We also deal with interactional expertise and the fact that much expertise is tacit. We explore three questions. First, in examining ‘when is expertise in research integration and implementation required?,’ we review tasks essential (a) to developing more comprehensive understandings of complex problems, plus possible ways to address them, and (b) for supporting implementation of those understandings into government policy, community practice, business and social innovation, or other initiatives. Second, in considering ‘where can expertise in research integration and implementation currently be found?,’ we describe three realms: (a) specific approaches, including interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, systems thinking and sustainability science; (b) case-based experience that is independent of these specific approaches; and (c) research examining elements of integration and implementation, specifically considering unknowns and fostering innovation. We highlight examples of expertise in each realm and demonstrate how fragmentation currently precludes clear identification of research integration and implementation expertise. Third, in exploring ‘what is required to strengthen expertise in research integration and implementation?,’ we propose building a knowledge bank. We delve into three key challenges: compiling existing expertise, indexing and organising the expertise to make it widely accessible, and understanding and overcoming the core reasons for the existing fragmentation. A growing knowledge bank of expertise in research integration and implementation on the one hand, and accumulating success in addressing complex societal and environmental problems on the other, will form a virtuous cycle so that each strengthens the other. Building a coalition of researchers and institutions will ensure this expertise and its application are valued and sustained.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference143 articles.
1. Ackoff RL (1974) Redesigning the future. A systems approach to societal problems. Wiley, New York, NY 2. Ackoff RL (1981) Creating the corporate future. Wiley, New York, NY 3. Adner R (2012) The wide lens. Penguin, London 4. Aven T (2012) Foundations of risk analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester 5. Babor T, Caulkins J, Fischer B, Foxcroft D, Humphreys K, Medina-Mora M, Obot I, Rehm J, Reuter P, Room R, Rossow I, Strang J (2018) Drug policy and the public good, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cited by
113 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|