Ethnographic methods: Training norms and practices and the future of American anthropology

Author:

Negrón Rosalyn1ORCID,Wutich Amber2,Russell Bernard H.2,Brewis Alexandra2,Ruth Alissa2,Mayfour Katherine2,Piperata Barbara3,Beresford Melissa4,SturtzSreetharan Cindi2,Mahdavi Pardis5,Hardin Jessica6,Zarger Rebecca7,Harper Krista8,Jones James Holland9,Gravlee Clarence C.10,Brayboy Bryan11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anthropology University of Massachusetts Boston Boston Massachusetts USA

2. School of Human Evolution and Social Change Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA

3. Department of Anthropology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

4. Department of Anthropology San José State University San José California USA

5. President University of La Verne La Verne California USA

6. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester New York USA

7. Department of Anthropology University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA

8. Department of Anthropology and School of Public Policy University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts USA

9. School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences Stanford University Stanford California USA

10. Department of Anthropology University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

11. Dean, School of Education and Social Policy Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractAmerican anthropology is engaged in significant self‐reckonings that call for big changes to how anthropology is practiced. These include (1) recognizing and taking seriously the demands to decolonize the ways research is done, (2) addressing precarious employment in academic anthropology, and (3) creating a discipline better positioned to respond to urgent societal needs. A central role for ethnographic methods training is a thread that runs through each of these three reckonings. This article, written by a team of cultural, biocultural, and linguistic anthropologists, outlines key connections between ethnographic methods training and the challenges facing anthropology. We draw on insights from a large‐scale survey of American Anthropological Association members to examine current ethnographic methods capabilities and training practices. Study findings are presented and explored to answer three guiding questions: To what extent do our current anthropological practices in ethnographic methods training serve to advance or undermine current calls for disciplinary change? To what extent do instructors themselves identify disconnects between their own practices and the need for innovation? And, finally, what can be done, and at what scale, to leverage ethnographic methods training to meet calls for disciplinary change?

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference103 articles.

1. The Decolonizing Generation: (Race and) Theory in Anthropology since the Eighties

2. Interdisciplinary Co‐teaching Takes on Wicked Problems;Avineri Netta;Anthropology News,2021

3. The Fifth Subdiscipline: Anthropological Practice and the Future of Anthropology;Baba Marietta L.;Human Organization,1994

4. Decolonizing Ethnography

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3