Biased polls: investigating the pressures survey respondents feel

Author:

Claassen Ryan L.ORCID,Ryan John Barry

Abstract

AbstractDemocratic bias in polls reached record highs in recent elections. The Shy Trump Voter Hypothesis claims some voters feel pressure to hide plans to vote for Trump. Despite several scholarly efforts to assess whether shy Trump voters contribute significantly to Democratic bias, the jury is still out. We undertake a thorough investigation using the longstanding, and more general, social desirability framework to consider why some survey subjects might be shy about revealing their support for any candidate. We randomly assign voters to either report the candidate they would SAY they would vote for if they wanted to make the best impression on others or the worst impression. In a new addition to this experiment, we then return to each voter with the opposite condition. Doing so allows us to investigate the causes and consequences of the social pressures voters feel when discussing which candidate they support. We show that the pressures voters feel are a function of the partisan context in which they live and we focus on voters that feel pressure to say they support a candidate other than the candidate of the party with which they identify. Although we demonstrate that cross-pressured partisans are more likely to say they intend to vote for the other party’s candidate than unpressured partisans, they occur on both sides and so polling bias created by them (should they revert to their party’s candidate in the voting booth) is likely reduced in the aggregate.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference51 articles.

1. Baltz, Dan. 2021. 2020 presidential polls suffered worst performance in decades, report says. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020-poll-errors/2021/07/18/8d6a9838-e7df-11eb-ba5d-55d3b5ffcaf1_story.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2023.

2. Beck, Paul Allen, Russell J. Dalton, Steven Greene, and Robert Huckfeldt. 2002. The social calculus of voting: interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review 96 (1): 57–73.

3. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: a study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4. Berinsky, Adam J., and Howard Lavine. 2012. Self-monitoring and political attitudes. In Improving public opinion surveys: interdisciplinary innovation and the American National Election Studies, ed. John H. Aldrich and Kathleen M. McGraw. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

5. Blair, Graeme, Alexander Coppock, and Margaret Moor. 2020. When to worry about sensitivity bias: a social reference theory and evidence from 30 years of list experiments. American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1297–1315.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3