The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices

Author:

BECK PAUL ALLEN,DALTON RUSSELL J.,GREENE STEVEN,HUCKFELDT ROBERT

Abstract

Voting choices are a product of both personal attitudes and social contexts, of a personal and a social calculus. Research has illuminated the personal calculus of voting, but the social calculus has received little attention since the 1940s. This study expands our understanding of the social influences on individual choice by examining the relationship of partisan biases in media, organizational, and interpersonal intermediaries to the voting choices of Americans. Its results show that the traditional sources of social influence still dominate: Interpersonal discussion outweighs the media in affecting the vote. Media effects appear to be the product of newspaper editorial pages rather than television or newspaper reporting, which contain so little perceptible bias that they often are misperceived as hostile. Parties and secondary organizations also are influential, but only for less interested voters—who are more affected by social contexts in general. Overall, this study demonstrates that democratic citizens are embedded in social contexts that join with personal traits in shaping their voting decisions.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference58 articles.

1. Przeworski Adam Teune Henry 1970 The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry New York Wiley

2. Ranney Austin 1983 Channels of Power New York Basic Books

3. Leege David C. Kellstedt Lyman A. 1993 Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics Armouk, NY M. E. Sharpe

4. Huckfeldt Robert Beck Paul Allen Dalton Russell J. Levine Jonathan 1995 Political Contexts, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion American Journal of Political Science 39 November 1025 54

5. Bennett W. Lance Entman Robert M. 2001 Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

Cited by 282 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Biased polls: investigating the pressures survey respondents feel;Acta Politica;2024-07-29

2. Social Capital, Government Expenditures, and Growth;Journal of the European Economic Association;2024-07-24

3. Social capital, social heterogeneity, and electoral turnout;Kyklos;2024-07-17

4. State’s Role in Income Inequality: Social Preferences and Life Satisfaction;International Advances in Economic Research;2024-07-09

5. Redistributive Politics under Spatial Inequality;The Journal of Politics;2024-07-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3