Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify and consolidate the components and consequences of intra-brand image confusion (IBIC). In addition to validating previous research results on IBIC in a fresh context (different product category with its brands), this study challenges the linearity assumption usually underlying studies of branding impacts and IBIC. A national representative online survey was conducted in the United Kingdom investigating the smartphone market. Explorative factor analyses were conducted in order to assess the components of IBIC. Structural equation modeling reveals the extent and consequences of IBIC. Multiple regressions were conducted to further explore non-linear response at the sub-domain and higher-order construct level. The results confirm and solidify previous results on the relevance of the construct of IBIC. This study supports the relevance of intra-brand image confusion’s three components. A novel contribution arises from the fact that customers with a moderate involvement level are more confused than people with lower involvement levels. A U-shaped response indicates that lower involved prospective customers are at higher risk of a confusion by too broad assortments. Brand managers are well advised to pay strong attention to the structure of an assortment and to sub-brands to prevent the occurrence of an IBIC.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Marketing,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Strategy and Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference127 articles.
1. Aaker, D.A., and K.L. Keller. 1990. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 54 (1): 27–41.
2. Abelson, R.P., E. Aronson, W.J. McGuire, T.M. Newcomb, M.J. Rosenberg, and P.H. Tannenbaum. 1968. Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
3. Ahearne, M., C.B. Bhattacharya, and T. Gruen. 2005. Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: Expanding the role of relationship marketing. The Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (3): 574–585.
4. Alhaddad, A. 2014. The effect of brand image and brand loyalty on brand equity. International Journal of Business and Management Invention 3: 28–32.
5. Aliyev, F., R. Wagner, and S. Seuring. 2019. Common and contradictory motivations in buying intentions for green and luxury automobiles. Sustainability 11 (12): 3268.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献