Abstract
AbstractComplexity-sensitive decision support approaches (CSDSA) have gained prominence in the research for development (R4D) sector. However, limited attention has been given to critically examining the underlying causal assumptions of CSDSAs and their overall effectiveness in navigating complexity and achieving desired outcomes. Scaling Readiness has emerged as a novel CSDSA that is increasingly applied in R4D programs in low- and middle-income countries to improve the scaling of innovation. This study offers theory-based explanations on the extent to which Scaling Readiness supports evidence-based design, implementation and monitoring of scaling strategies in two R4D interventions. The contribution of Scaling Readiness is influenced by various contextual factors, including pre-existing partnerships and established institutional intervention project and performance management practices. The findings underscore the significance of investing in broader institutional impact culture growth. This includes critical evaluation of how funding, incentive, and performance mechanisms enable or constrain evidence-based decision-making and adaptive management at intervention and organizational level towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals.
Funder
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference50 articles.
1. Argyris, C., and D. Schön. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison Wesley 305 (2): 107–120.
2. Astbury, B., and F.L. Leeuw. 2010. Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 31 (3): 363–381.
3. Barrett, C.B., T.G. Benton, K.A. Cooper, J. Fanzo, R. Gandhi, M. Herrero, S. James, M. Kahn, D. Mason-D’Croz,
A. Mathys, and R.J. Nelson. 2020. Bundling innovations to transform agri-food systems. Nature Sustainability
3 (12): 974–976.
4. Beach, D. and R.B. Pedersen. 2011. What is process tracing actually rracing? the three variants of process tracing methods and their uses and limitations’, paper prepared for presentation at the American political science association annual meeting (pp. 1–4). Washington: Seattle.
5. Beach, D., and R.B. Pedersen. 2019. Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献