Improving Scaling Performance in Research for Development: Learning from a Realist Evaluation of the Scaling Readiness Approach

Author:

Damtew EliasORCID,Douthwaite BoruORCID,Schut MarcORCID,Sartas MuratORCID,Leeuwis Cees

Abstract

AbstractComplexity-sensitive decision support approaches (CSDSA) have gained prominence in the research for development (R4D) sector. However, limited attention has been given to critically examining the underlying causal assumptions of CSDSAs and their overall effectiveness in navigating complexity and achieving desired outcomes. Scaling Readiness has emerged as a novel CSDSA that is increasingly applied in R4D programs in low- and middle-income countries to improve the scaling of innovation. This study offers theory-based explanations on the extent to which Scaling Readiness supports evidence-based design, implementation and monitoring of scaling strategies in two R4D interventions. The contribution of Scaling Readiness is influenced by various contextual factors, including pre-existing partnerships and established institutional intervention project and performance management practices. The findings underscore the significance of investing in broader institutional impact culture growth. This includes critical evaluation of how funding, incentive, and performance mechanisms enable or constrain evidence-based decision-making and adaptive management at intervention and organizational level towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals.

Funder

Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference50 articles.

1. Argyris, C., and D. Schön. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison Wesley 305 (2): 107–120.

2. Astbury, B., and F.L. Leeuw. 2010. Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 31 (3): 363–381.

3. Barrett, C.B., T.G. Benton, K.A. Cooper, J. Fanzo, R. Gandhi, M. Herrero, S. James, M. Kahn, D. Mason-D’Croz, A. Mathys, and R.J. Nelson. 2020. Bundling innovations to transform agri-food systems. Nature Sustainability 3 (12): 974–976.

4. Beach, D. and R.B. Pedersen. 2011. What is process tracing actually rracing? the three variants of process tracing methods and their uses and limitations’, paper prepared for presentation at the American political science association annual meeting (pp. 1–4). Washington: Seattle.

5. Beach, D., and R.B. Pedersen. 2019. Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3