Oralizations in e-mail consultations: A study of general practitioners’ use of non-verbal cues in written doctor‐patient communication

Author:

Nordtug Maja1ORCID,Møller Jane Ege1ORCID,Matthiesen Signe Schlichting1ORCID,Brøgger Matilde Nisbeth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 0000000119562722Aarhus University

Abstract

It is well-known that non-verbal cues are essential in doctor‐patient communication. As doctor‐patient communication is turning increasingly digital and written, it becomes relevant to explore the role of non-verbal cues in such communication genres. One more recent genre is the doctor‐patient e-mail consultation. Research has found that while patients like e-mail consultations, they also miss facial expressions, eye contact, etc. In this study, we explored the different ways in which Danish GPs use non-verbal cues in e-mail consultations. We analysed 633 e-mail consultations written by 22 GPs. We applied the concept of oralization, which includes the use of emoticons and non-standard use of grammar and spatial arrangement. We found that the dominant types of oralizations were non-corrected spelling errors and lack of attention to capitalization. Overall, GPs used a limited number of other non-verbal cues. We discuss how these findings relate to norms of formality and professional context.

Publisher

Intellect

Subject

Communication,Cultural Studies

Reference44 articles.

1. A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents;Pediatrics,2005

2. What does an e-mail address add?: Doing health and technology at home;Social Science & Medicine,2011

3. Patients who use e-mediated communication with their doctor: New constructions of trust in the patient-doctor relationship;Qualitative Health Research,2006

4. Multilevel structures and human agency in relation to email consultations: A strong structuration theory analysis of the Danish general practice setting;Social Science & Medicine,2021

5. Email consultations between patients and doctors in primary care: Content analysis;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3