Keeping it free: Sport television and public policy in Australia

Author:

Rowe David1ORCID,Tiffen Rodney2,Hutchins Brett3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISNI: 0000000099395719 Western Sydney University

2. ISNI: 000000041936834X University of Sydney

3. ISNI: 0000000419367857 Monash University

Abstract

This article addresses issues surrounding changes in television in the digital age, focusing specifically on questions of cultural citizenship as they relate to sport on television. It considers the curious neglect of sport in the Australian Government’s 2020 ‘Media Reform Green Paper: Modernising television regulation in Australia’, especially given its focus on the current problems of free-to-air (FTA) television and the importance of sport to it. In Australia, as in many other countries, there is some legislative protection to enable sport ‘events of national importance and cultural significance’ to be broadcast without charge to whole national communities, thereby preventing their ‘siphoning’ by subscription television providers. These regulatory arrangements have come under increasing pressure, including from screen-based content providers offering over-the-top (OTT) internet-enabled, on-demand streaming services. The article considers the public policy and social equity ramifications of regulating screen-based sport in this dynamic media environment. It is argued that there is a strong case for an anti-siphoning list covering selected live sport events to be maintained, revised as necessary and protected from circumvention in an era where FTA television remains a popular, reliable and widely accessible media technology that has minimal barriers to viewing citizens. We conclude that television regulation in Australia cannot be ‘modernised’ by allowing the anti-siphoning regime to wither on the vine in gesturing to technological innovation, market de-regulation and unequal choice. Such interventions in national media and sport markets can, it is proposed, enable the necessary innovation to enhance rather than erode cultural citizenship rights for the benefit of large segments of society.

Publisher

Intellect

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Media Technology,Communication

Reference71 articles.

1. Rage against the machine: Buffering, noise, and perpetual anxiety in the age of connected viewing;Cinema Journal,2017

2. Australian Government (2017), ‘Reform of the anti-siphoning scheme regulation impact statement’, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1718a/18bd08. Accessed 17 November 2021.

3. Australian Government (2020), ‘Media Reform Green Paper: Modernising television regulation in Australia’, 21 December, https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/new-rules-new-media-landscape-modernising-television-regulation-australia. Accessed 11 January 2022.

4. Australian Government (2021), ‘Current anti-siphoning list to continue to 2023’, 22 March, https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/fletcher/media-release/current-anti-siphoning-list-continue-2023. Accessed 1 September 2021.

5. Citizenship as cultural: Towards a theory of cultural citizenship;Sociology Compass,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3