‘Signal integrity’ in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Process, positions and policies examined and explained

Author:

Afilipoaie Adelaida1ORCID,Dewaele Steven1ORCID,Donders Karen1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 0000000122908069Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Abstract

Technological convergence has pushed the broadcasting value chain into a state of imbalance. The updated Audiovisual Media Services Directive with its provision on signal integrity attempts to recalibrate the power relations in the value chain while also aspiring to achieve cultural objectives. By triangulating qualitative research methods, we investigate what signal integrity is from a legal and technical perspective, we identify the cases in which signals are protected and determine stakeholder positions. Our main finding is that signal integrity’s scope might be larger than envisaged by the European Commission but needs to be more carefully pinned down to ensure consistency of definition, interpretation and application across Member States. Furthermore, while protecting signal integrity supposedly serves a combined economic and cultural agenda, it mainly serves broadcasters’ financial interests. However, since broadcasters invest most in general interest and original content, this kind of economic protectionism could be justifiable.

Funder

Funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors

Publisher

Intellect

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Media Technology,Communication

Reference46 articles.

1. The Netflix Original and what it means for the production of European television content;Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies,2021

2. Objects, metrics and practices: An inquiry into the programmatic advertising ecosystem,2018

3. The Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Balancing liberalisation and protection,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Signal integrity;European Audiovisual Policy in Transition;2023-04-03

2. ‘Signal integrity’ in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Process, positions and policies examined and explained;Journal of Digital Media & Policy;2021-11-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3