Beware the neuromyths! A critical discussion on the ‘brainification’ of early childhood music

Author:

Young Susan1

Affiliation:

1. 0000000104687274University of Roehampton

Abstract

References to neuroscience and the brain now crop up regularly in academic and pedagogical literatures in early childhood music education. In this article, I discuss this recent ‘brainification’ (a term coined by Vandenbroeck) of early childhood music and point out problems and pitfalls that can arise from this current enthusiasm for neuroscience narratives. Concern at the misinterpretation of neuroscientific research in music education, often referred to as neuromyths, has led to a small and important body of literature. This literature is reviewing, analysing and providing summaries of neuroscience in music, correcting misconceptions and clarifying the implications for educational practice. First, I introduce this work and outline its main arguments. However, despite these corrections and clarifications, neuromyths persist. Therefore, I go on to ask why ‐ when the research base is being demonstrated to have many limitations ‐ do certain neuroscientific ideas continue to occupy such a prominent position? The answer I suggest lies in the current context of social media proliferation of information together with the certainty that neuromyth narratives (falsely) promise. I will go on to explain how the prominence of neuromyths goes hand in hand with the current policy environment for early childhood education and care that constructs children as a form of future investment. The article arrives at a number of suggestions for how the problems and pitfalls might be overcome or avoided.

Publisher

Intellect

Reference48 articles.

1. Brandolini, A. (@Antonio Brandolini) (2011), ‘Bullshit asymmetry principle’, 10 January, Twitter.com. Accessed 1 January 2019.

2. Controversy in statistical analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2017

3. Bruer, J. T. (2011), ‘Briefing paper: Revisiting “the myth of the first three years”’, Monitoring Parents: Science, Evidence, Experts and the New Parenting Culture, Centre for Parenting Culture Studies, Kent University, 13–14 September, blogs.kent.ac.uk/parentingculturestudies. Accessed 26 October 2017.

4. Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience;Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2013

5. Sensitive periods for music training from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: A review of the literature with implications for teaching practice;International Journal of Music in Early Childhood,2018

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3