Affiliation:
1. The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
2. P. I. Zabrodin Secondary General Education School No. 29
Abstract
Introduction. Response to challenges of actual mass demand for personalisation of education is not feasible without specification of idea, models and mechanisms of usage of “learning inquiry”, which are determined by regional, cultural, social, and historical specifics of society. Relevance of the research is based on the necessity to clarify the term “learning inquiry” to facilitate practical implementation of mechanisms of personal educational logistic realised in digital environment. The article’s objective is to present results of analysis of local and international interpretations of the term “learning inquiry” (or its equivalent) as well as practices of its formation and usage.
Materials and Methods. Local and global practices (formalised education, family education, “alternative” education) have been analysed with a searching depth of 5-8 years. Searching requests: educational inquiry, personal(sized) learning inquiry, personalized education, personalized learning, student-initiated learning, selflearning, etc. The following concepts have been reviewed: subjectivity, individualisation, personalization, personification, choice theories by D. Leontiev, intermediate action theory by B. Elkonin, theory of complicated systems and personality by K. Rogers, field theory by K. Levin, concept of deep knowledge by K. Duek, etc.; models and practices of active learning based on subjective position of a student.
Results. Specifics of terminology related to personalized education are determined and described. A preterm “learning request” has been introduced via system of basic principles of creation of “learning inquiry” model. It has been shown that “learning inquiry” is realized via various educational institutions. In digital environment “learning inquiry” becomes a trigger for transformation towards educational logistic.
Discussion and Conclusion. Research results contribute to development of practices of construction of position by participants of educational activity, to practices of work with learning inquiry, to enable to develop mechanisms of transformation towards personal educational logistic and, therefore, to facilitate readiness of educational systems to realisation of personalized education.
Funder
Russian Foundation for Basic Research
Publisher
National Research Mordovia State University MRSU
Reference25 articles.
1. Rabinovich P.D., Zavedenskiy K.E., Kushnir M.E., Khramov Yu.E., Melik-Parsadanov A.R. Digital Transformation of Education: From Changing Funds to Developing Activities. Informatika i obrazovanie = Informatics and Education. 2020; (5):4-14. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-5-4-14
2. Kushnir M.E., Rabinovich P.D., Khramov Yu.E., Zavedensky K.E. Educational Logistics in a Digital School. Informatika i obrazovaniye = Informatics and Education. 2019; (9):5-11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-9-5-11
3. Asmolov A.G. Pedagogy of Personalization as an Anthropological Project. Narodnoye obrazovanie = Public Education. 2021; (3):75-82. Available at: http://narodnoe.org/journals/narodnoe-obrazovanie/2021-3/personalizaciya-obrazovaniya-i-antropologiya-budushego- (accessed 25.08.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Asmolov A.G., Anthropology of Everyday: Transformation of Human Behavior under Technological and Social Change. Lurian Journal. 2021; 2(1):6-18. Available at: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/97197/1/lj-1-2021-01.pdf (accessed 25.08.2021). (In. Eng., abstract in Russ.)
5. Elkonin B.D. Productive Action. Kulturno-istoricheskaya psihologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2019; 15(1):116-122. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/files/97522/chp_2019_n1_Elkonin.pdf (accessed 25.08.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献