Possibilities and limitations of platelet counting methods

Author:

Tsvetkova T. G.1ORCID,Kalashnikova A. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NRCERM EMERCOM of Russia

Abstract

   Currently, the use of hematological analyzers makes it possible to quickly and accurately count the number of platelets in the vast majority of blood samples. In some cases, the automatic determination of this indicator may be incorrect, due to the limitations of the methods used. Monitoring the results of automatic platelet count is necessary when obtaining pathological values and is carried out by microscopic examination of a peripheral blood smear. The article describes the methods and limitations of automatic determination of the number of platelets, possible causes of erroneous counting and ways to correct the result. Morphological descriptions of the most common artifacts that affect the correct definition of this indicator are presented. Modern methodological approaches to solving the problem of correct platelet counting in EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia are highlighted.

Publisher

Alfmed LLC

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry

Reference34 articles.

1. Klinicheskoe rukovodstvo po laboratornym testam / Pod redaktsiei N. Titsa ; Perevod s angl. ; pod redaktsiei V. V. Men'shikova. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «YuNIMED-press», 2003. – 960 s. – Clinical guidelines for laboratory tests. Edited by N. Titz. Translated from English. edited by V. V. Menshikov. M.: Publishing house ‘UNIMED-press’. 2003. 960 p.

2. Trabuio E., Valverde S., Antico F., et al. Performance of automated platelet quantification using different analysers in comparison with an immunological reference method in thrombocytopenic patients. Blood Transfus. 2009; (7): 43–48. DOI: 10.2450/2008.0039–08.

3. Tantanate S., Khowawisetsut L., Pattanapanyasat K. Performance evaluation of automated impedance and optical fluorescence platelet counts compared with international reference method in patients with thalassemia. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017; (141): 830–836. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016–0222-OA.

4. Zandecki M., Genevieve F., Gerard J., Godon A. Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: A review. Part I: Platelets. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2007; (29): 4–20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365–2257.2006.00870.x.

5. Noris P., Biino G., Pecci A., et al. Platelet diameters in inherited thrombocytopenias: Analysis of 376 patients with all known disorders. Blood. 2014; (124): e 4–e 10. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014–03–564328.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3