Optimizing Spatial Quality Control for a Dense Network of Meteorological Stations

Author:

Alerskans Emy12,Lussana Cristian3,Nipen Thomas N.3,Seierstad Ivar A.3

Affiliation:

1. a Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

2. b FieldSense A/S, Aarhus, Denmark

3. c Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Abstract Crowdsourced meteorological observations are becoming more prevalent and in some countries their spatial resolution already far exceeds that of traditional networks. However, due to the larger uncertainty associated with these observations, quality control (QC) is an essential step. Spatial QC methods are especially well suited for such dense networks since they utilize information from nearby stations. The performance of such methods usually depends on the choice of their parameters. There is, however, currently no specific procedure on how to choose the optimal settings of such spatial QC methods. In this study we present a framework for tuning a spatial QC method for a dense network of meteorological observations. The method uses artificial errors in order to perturb the observations to simulate the effect of having errors. A cost function, based on the hit and false alarm rate, for optimizing the spatial QC method is introduced. The parameters of the spatial QC method are then tuned such that the cost function is optimized. The application of the framework to the tuning of a spatial QC method for a dense network of crowdsourced observations in Denmark is presented. Our findings show that the optimal settings vary with the error magnitude, time of day, and station density. Furthermore, we show that when the station network is sparse, a better performance of the spatial QC method can be obtained by including crowdsourced observations from another denser network.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Ocean Engineering

Reference57 articles.

1. TITAN automatic spatial quality control of meteorological in-situ observations;Båserud, L.,2020

2. How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion;Bell, S.,2015

3. The early instrumental warm-bias: A solution for long central European temperature series 1760–2007;Böhm, R.,2010

4. Bormann, N., H. Lawrence, and J. Faranan, 2019: Global observing system experiments in the ECMWF assimilation system. ECMWF Tech Memo. 839, 26 pp., https://doi.org/10.21957/sr184iyz.

5. Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850;Brohan, P.,2006

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3