Evaluation of HOAPS-3 Ocean Surface Freshwater Flux Components

Author:

Andersson Axel1,Klepp Christian1,Fennig Karsten2,Bakan Stephan3,Grassl Hartmut1,Schulz Jörg4

Affiliation:

1. Meteorologisches Institut der Universität, Hamburg, Germany

2. Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom

3. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

4. Deutscher Wetterdienst, Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring, Offenbach, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Today, latent heat flux and precipitation over the global ocean surface can be determined from microwave satellite data as a basis for estimating the related fields of the ocean surface freshwater flux. The Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data (HOAPS) is the only generally available satellite-based dataset with consistently derived global fields of both evaporation and precipitation and hence of freshwater flux for the period 1987–2005. This paper presents a comparison of the evaporation E, precipitation P, and the resulting freshwater flux E − P in HOAPS with recently available reference datasets from reanalysis and other satellite observation projects as well as in situ ship measurements. In addition, the humidity and wind speed input parameters for the evaporation are examined to identify sources for differences between the datasets. Results show that the general climatological patterns are reproduced by all datasets. Global mean time series often agree within about 10% of the individual products, while locally larger deviations may be found for all parameters. HOAPS often agrees better with the other satellite-derived datasets than with the in situ or the reanalysis data. The agreement usually improves in regions of good in situ sampling statistics. The biggest deviations of the evaporation parameter result from differences in the near-surface humidity estimates. The precipitation datasets exhibit large differences in highly variable regimes with the largest absolute differences in the ITCZ and the largest relative biases in the extratropical storm-track regions. The resulting freshwater flux estimates exhibit distinct differences in terms of global averages as well as regional biases. In comparison with long-term mean global river runoff data, the ocean surface freshwater balance is not closed by any of the compared fields. The datasets exhibit a positive bias in E − P of 0.2–0.5 mm day−1, which is on the order of 10% of the evaporation and precipitation estimates.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference63 articles.

1. Intercomparison of global precipitation products: The third Precipitation Intercomparison Project (PIP-3).;Adler;Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,2001

2. The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present).;Adler;J. Hydrometeor.,2003

3. Anticipated changes in the global atmospheric water cycle.;Allan;Environ. Res. Lett.,2010

4. Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data—HOAPS-3—Monthly mean. World Data Center for Climate.;Andersson,2007

5. Satellite derived precipitation and freshwater flux variability and its dependence on the North Atlantic Oscillation.;Andersson;Tellus,2010

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3