Inconsistent Global Kinetic Energy Spectra in Reanalyses and Models

Abstract

AbstractGlobal upper tropospheric kinetic energy (KE) spectra in several global atmospheric circulation datasets are examined. The datasets considered include the ERA-Interim, JRA-55, and ERA5 reanalyses and two versions of NOAA-GFS analyses at horizontal resolutions ranging from 0.7° to 0.12°. The mesoscale portions of the spectra are found to be highly inconsistent. This is shown to be mainly due to inconsistencies in the scale-dependent numerical damping and in the large contributions to the global mesoscale KE from the KE in convective regions and near orography.The spectra also generally have a steeper mesoscale slope than the -5/3 slope of the observational Nastrom-Gage spectrum pursued at many modeling centers. The sensitivity of the slope in global models to 1) stochastically perturbing diabatic tendencies and 2) decreasing the horizontal hyper-viscosity coefficient is explored in large ensembles of 10-day forecasts made with the NCEP-GFS (0.7° grid) model. Both changes lead to larger mesoscale KE and a flatter spectral slope. The effect is stronger in the modified hyper-viscosity experiment.These results show that (a) despite assimilating vastly more observations than used in the original Nastrom-Gage studies, current high-resolution global analyses still do not converge to a single “true” global mesoscale KE spectrum, and (b) model KE spectra can be made flatter not just by increasing model resolution but also by perturbing model physics and decreasing horizontal diffusion. Such sensitivities and lack of consensus on the spectral slope also raise the possibility that the true global mesoscale spectral slope may not be a precisely -5/3 slope.