Temperature and Water Vapor Variance Scaling in Global Models: Comparisons to Satellite and Aircraft Data

Author:

Kahn B. H.1,Teixeira J.1,Fetzer E. J.1,Gettelman A.2,Hristova-Veleva S. M.1,Huang X.3,Kochanski A. K.4,Köhler M.5,Krueger S. K.4,Wood R.6,Zhao M.7

Affiliation:

1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

2. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

3. Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

4. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

5. Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany

6. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

7. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Abstract

AbstractObservations of the scale dependence of height-resolved temperature T and water vapor q variability are valuable for improved subgrid-scale climate model parameterizations and model evaluation. Variance spectral benchmarks for T and q obtained from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) are compared to those generated by state-of-the-art numerical weather prediction “analyses” and “free-running” climate model simulations with spatial resolution comparable to AIRS. The T and q spectra from both types of models are generally too steep, with small-scale variance up to several factors smaller than AIRS. However, the two model analyses more closely resemble AIRS than the two free-running model simulations. Scaling exponents obtained for AIRS column water vapor (CWV) and height-resolved layers of q are also compared to the superparameterized Community Atmospheric Model (SP-CAM), highlighting large differences in the magnitude of CWV variance and the relative flatness of height-resolved q scaling in SP-CAM. Height-resolved q spectra obtained from aircraft observations during the Variability of the American Monsoon Systems Ocean–Cloud–Atmosphere–Land Study Regional Experiment (VOCALS-REx) demonstrate changes in scaling exponents that depend on the observations’ proximity to the base of the subsidence inversion with scale breaks that occur at approximately the dominant cloud scale (~10–30 km). This suggests that finer spatial resolution requirements must be considered for future satellite observations of T and q than those currently planned for infrared and microwave satellite sounders.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference57 articles.

1. The New GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2–LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations;Anderson;J. Climate,2004

2. AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua mission: Design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems;Aumann;IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,2003

3. Bogenschutz, P. A. , 2011: Improving the representation of turbulence and clouds in cloud resolving models and general circulation models. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah, 320 pp.

4. Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models;Bony;Geophys. Res. Lett.,2005

5. Sensitivity of simulated climate to model resolution;Boville;J. Climate,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3