Comparison of Hurricane Return Levels Using Historical and Geological Records

Author:

Elsner James B.1,Jagger Thomas H.1,Liu Kam-biu2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

2. Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Abstract

Abstract Hurricane return levels estimated using historical and geological information are quantitatively compared for Lake Shelby, Alabama. The minimum return level of overwash events recorded in sediment cores is estimated using a modern analog (Hurricane Ivan of 2004) to be 54 m s−1 (105 kt) for a return period of 318 yr based on 11 events over 3500 yr. The expected return level of rare hurricanes in the observed records (1851–2005) at this location and for this return period is estimated using a parametric statistical model and a maximum likelihood procedure to be 73 m s−1 (141 kt), with a lower bound on the 95% confidence interval of 64 m s−1 (124 kt). Results are not significantly different if data are taken from the shorter 1880–2005 period. Thus, the estimated sensitivity of Lake Shelby to overwash events is consistent with the historical record given the model. In fact, assuming the past is similar to the present, the sensitivity of the site to overwash events as estimated from the model is likely more accurately set at 64 m s−1.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference16 articles.

1. Back-barrier sedimentary records of intense hurricane landfalls in the northeastern United States.;Donnelly,2004

2. A backbarrier overwash record of intense storms from Brigantine, New Jersey.;Donnelly;Mar. Geol.,2004

3. Spatial variations in major U.S. hurricane activity: Statistics and a physical mechanism.;Elsner;J. Climate,2000

4. A note on the radius of maximum wind for hurricanes.;Hsu;J. Coastal Res.,1998

5. Climatology models for extreme hurricane winds in the United States.;Jagger;J. Climate,2006

Cited by 50 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3