Applying the NWS’s Distributed Hydrologic Model to Short-Range Forecasting of Quickflow in the Mahantango Creek Watershed

Author:

Buda Anthony R.1,Reed Seann M.2,Folmar Gordon J.1,Kennedy Casey D.3,Millar David J.3,Kleinman Peter J. A.4,Miller Douglas A.5,Drohan Patrick J.6

Affiliation:

1. a Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, University Park, Pennsylvania

2. b Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center, National Weather Service, State College, Pennsylvania

3. c Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, East Wareham, Massachusetts

4. d Soil Management and Sugarbeet Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado

5. e Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

6. f Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Abstract

Abstract Accurate and reliable forecasts of quickflow, including interflow and overland flow, are essential for predicting rainfall–runoff events that can wash off recently applied agricultural nutrients. In this study, we examined whether a gridded version of the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model with Heat Transfer (SAC-HT) could simulate and forecast quickflow in two agricultural watersheds in east-central Pennsylvania. Specifically, we used the Hydrology Laboratory–Research Distributed Hydrologic Model (HL-RDHM) software, which incorporates SAC-HT, to conduct a 15-yr (2003–17) simulation of quickflow in the 420-km2 Mahantango Creek watershed and in WE-38, a 7.3-km2 headwater interior basin. We directly calibrated HL-RDHM using hydrologic observations at the Mahantango Creek outlet, while all grid cells within Mahantango Creek, including WE-38, were calibrated indirectly using scalar multipliers derived from the basin outlet calibration. Using the calibrated model, we then assessed the quality of short-range (24–72 h) deterministic forecasts of daily quickflow in both watersheds over a 2-yr period (July 2017–October 2019). At the basin outlet, HL-RDHM quickflow simulations showed low biases (PBIAS = 10.5%) and strong agreement (KGE″ = 0.81) with observations. At the headwater scale, HL-RDHM overestimated quickflow (PBIAS = 69.0%) to a greater degree, but quickflow simulations remained satisfactory (KGE″ = 0.65). When applied to quickflow forecasting, HL-RDHM produced skillful forecasts (>90% of Peirce and Gerrity skill scores above 0.5) at all lead times and significantly outperformed persistence forecasts, although skill gains in Mahantango Creek were slightly lower. Accordingly, short-range quickflow forecasts by HL-RDHM show promise for informing operational decision-making in agriculture. Significance Statement Daily runoff forecasts can alert farmers to rainfall–runoff events that have the potential to wash off recently applied fertilizers and manures. To gauge whether daily runoff forecasts are accurate and reliable, we used runoff monitoring data from a large agricultural watershed and one of its headwater tributaries to evaluate the quality of short-term runoff forecasts (1–3 days ahead) that were generated by a National Weather Service watershed model. Results showed that the accuracy and reliability of daily runoff forecasts generally improved in both watersheds as lead times increased from 1 to 3 days. Study findings highlight the potential for National Weather Service models to provide useful short-term runoff forecasts that can inform operational decision-making in agriculture.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference114 articles.

1. Flood forecasting in the United States NOAA/National Weather Service;Adams, T. E.,2016

2. The effect of QPF on real-time deterministic hydrologic forecast uncertainty;Adams, T. E.,2019

3. GloFAS – Global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning;Alfieri, L.,2013

4. Anderson, E., 2002: Calibration of conceptual hydrologic models for use in river forecasting. 372 pp., https://www.weather.gov/media/owp/oh/hrl/docs/1_Anderson_CalbManual.pdf.

5. Anderson, E., 2006: Snow accumulation and ablation model—SNOW-17. User’s manual, NWS, 61 pp., https://www.weather.gov/media/owp/oh/hdsc/docs/TM17.pdf.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3