Analysis of the Arctic System for Freshwater Cycle Intensification: Observations and Expectations

Author:

Rawlins Michael A.1,Steele Michael2,Holland Marika M.3,Adam Jennifer C.4,Cherry Jessica E.5,Francis Jennifer A.6,Groisman Pavel Ya7,Hinzman Larry D.5,Huntington Thomas G.8,Kane Douglas L.9,Kimball John S.10,Kwok Ron11,Lammers Richard B.12,Lee Craig M.13,Lettenmaier Dennis P.14,McDonald Kyle C.11,Podest Erika11,Pundsack Jonathan W.12,Rudels Bert15,Serreze Mark C.16,Shiklomanov Alexander12,Skagseth Øystein17,Troy Tara J.18,Vörösmarty Charles J.19,Wensnahan Mark2,Wood Eric F.18,Woodgate Rebecca2,Yang Daqing9,Zhang Ke10,Zhang Tingjun16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire

2. Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington

5. International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska

6. Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, Highlands, New Jersey

7. UCAR, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

8. U.S. Geological Survey, Augusta, Maine

9. Water and Environmental Research Center, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska

10. Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana

11. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

12. Water Systems Analysis Group, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire

13. Ocean Physics Department, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

14. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

15. Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, and Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland

16. National Snow and Ice Data Center, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

17. Institute of Marine Research, and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway

18. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

19. Department of Civil Engineering, The City University of New York, New York, New York

Abstract

Abstract Hydrologic cycle intensification is an expected manifestation of a warming climate. Although positive trends in several global average quantities have been reported, no previous studies have documented broad intensification across elements of the Arctic freshwater cycle (FWC). In this study, the authors examine the character and quantitative significance of changes in annual precipitation, evapotranspiration, and river discharge across the terrestrial pan-Arctic over the past several decades from observations and a suite of coupled general circulation models (GCMs). Trends in freshwater flux and storage derived from observations across the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas are also described. With few exceptions, precipitation, evapotranspiration, and river discharge fluxes from observations and the GCMs exhibit positive trends. Significant positive trends above the 90% confidence level, however, are not present for all of the observations. Greater confidence in the GCM trends arises through lower interannual variability relative to trend magnitude. Put another way, intrinsic variability in the observations tends to limit confidence in trend robustness. Ocean fluxes are less certain, primarily because of the lack of long-term observations. Where available, salinity and volume flux data suggest some decrease in saltwater inflow to the Barents Sea (i.e., a decrease in freshwater outflow) in recent decades. A decline in freshwater storage across the central Arctic Ocean and suggestions that large-scale circulation plays a dominant role in freshwater trends raise questions as to whether Arctic Ocean freshwater flows are intensifying. Although oceanic fluxes of freshwater are highly variable and consistent trends are difficult to verify, the other components of the Arctic FWC do show consistent positive trends over recent decades. The broad-scale increases provide evidence that the Arctic FWC is experiencing intensification. Efforts that aim to develop an adequate observation system are needed to reduce uncertainties and to detect and document ongoing changes in all system components for further evidence of Arctic FWC intensification.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3