Making CORE-OM data work for you and your service: A primary care psychology and counselling team’s experience of routine outcome measurement-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Making CORE-OM data work for you and your service: A primary care psychology and counselling team’s experience of routine outcome measurement

Published:2007-06 Issue:174 Volume:1 Page:31-34
ISSN:1747-5732
Container-title:Clinical Psychology Forum
language:en
Short-container-title:bpscpf

Author:

Shepherd Melanie,Evans Chris,Ashworth Mark,Nairne Kathy,Robinson Susan I.

Abstract

We describe benefits of introducing routine outcome measurement (ROM) in primary care services. Factors facilitating culture change are discussed and the importance of resources and data ownership noted.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference8 articles.

1. Setting up clinical audit in a psychodynamic psychotherapy service: A pilot study;Adelman;Psychiatric Bulletin,2003

2. Department of Health (2004). Organising and delivering psychological therapies. London: HMSO.

3. Practice- based evidence: benchmarking NHS primary care counselling services at national and local levels;Evans;Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy,2003

4. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM

5. Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating the impact of team formulation on client care in a rehabilitation hospital for individuals with learning disabilities;FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities;2021-12

2. When, how and why does indirect formulation work? Proposing a ‘shared formulation’ framework;Clinical Psychology Forum;2013-05

3. Beneath the CORE: Why do some psychological therapists see mental health clients with sub-clinical scores?;Clinical Psychology Forum;2008-10