Impact of Remote Telemedical Management on Mortality and Hospitalizations in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Author:

Koehler Friedrich1,Winkler Sebastian1,Schieber Michael1,Sechtem Udo1,Stangl Karl1,Böhm Michael1,Boll Herbert1,Baumann Gert1,Honold Marcus1,Koehler Kerstin1,Gelbrich Goetz1,Kirwan Bridget-Anne1,Anker Stefan D.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Cardiology and Angiology and Center for Cardiovascular Telemedicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany (F.K., S.W., K.S., G.B., K.K.); Robert Bosch Krankenhaus Stuttgart, Department of Cardiology, Stuttgart, Germany (M.S., U.S., M.H.); Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany (M.B.); Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany (H.B.); Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (G.G.);...

Abstract

Background— This study was designed to determine whether physician-led remote telemedical management (RTM) compared with usual care would result in reduced mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Methods and Results— We enrolled 710 stable chronic HF patients in New York Heart Association functional class II or III with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and a history of HF decompensation within the previous 2 years or with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25%. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to RTM or usual care. Remote telemedical management used portable devices for ECG, blood pressure, and body weight measurements connected to a personal digital assistant that sent automated encrypted transmission via cell phones to the telemedical centers. The primary end point was death from any cause. The first secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF. Baseline characteristics were similar between the RTM (n=354) and control (n=356) groups. Of the patients assigned to RTM, 287 (81%) were at least 70% compliant with daily data transfers and no break for >30 days (except during hospitalizations). The median follow-up was 26 months (minimum 12), and was 99.9% complete. Compared with usual care, RTM had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.41; P =0.87) or on cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.19; P =0.44). Conclusions— In ambulatory patients with chronic HF, RTM compared with usual care was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. Clinical Trial Registration:— URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00543881.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3