“Not the ‘Grim Reaper Service’”: An Assessment of Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions Regarding Palliative Care Referral Barriers in Heart Failure

Author:

Kavalieratos Dio12,Mitchell Emma M.3,Carey Timothy S.4,Dev Sandesh5,Biddle Andrea K.2,Reeve Bryce B.2,Abernethy Amy P.267,Weinberger Morris248

Affiliation:

1. Center for Research on Health Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

3. School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, FL

4. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

5. Phoenix Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ

6. Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

7. Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC

8. Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC

Abstract

Background Although similar to cancer patients regarding symptom burden and prognosis, patients with heart failure ( HF ) tend to receive palliative care far less frequently. We sought to explore factors perceived by cardiology, primary care, and palliative care providers to impede palliative care referral for HF patients. Methods and Results We conducted semistructured interviews regarding (1) perceived needs of patients with advanced HF ; (2) knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with specialist palliative care; (3) perceived indications for and optimal timing of palliative care referral in HF ; and (4) perceived barriers to palliative care referral. Two investigators analyzed data using template analysis, a qualitative technique. We interviewed 18 physician, nurse practitioner, and physician assistant providers from 3 specialties: cardiology, primary care, and palliative care. Providers had limited knowledge regarding what palliative care is, and how it can complement traditional HF therapy to decrease HF ‐related suffering. Interviews identified several potential barriers: the unpredictable course of HF ; lack of clear referral triggers across the HF trajectory; and ambiguity regarding what differentiates standard HF therapy from palliative care. Nevertheless, providers expressed interest for integrating palliative care into traditional HF care, but were unsure of how to initiate collaboration. Conclusions Palliative care referral for HF patients may be suboptimal due to limited provider knowledge and misperceptions of palliative care as a service reserved for those near death. These factors represent potentially modifiable targets for provider education, which may help to improve palliative care referral for HF patients with unresolved disease‐related burden.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3