Current Limitations of Invasive Exercise Hemodynamics for the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Author:

Baratto Claudia12,Caravita Sergio13ORCID,Soranna Davide4,Faini Andrea1ORCID,Dewachter Céline5,Zambon Antonella64,Perego Giovanni Battista1,Bondue Antoine5,Senni Michele7,Badano Luigi P.12ORCID,Parati Gianfranco12ORCID,Vachiéry Jean-Luc5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Ospedale San Luca, Milano, Italy (C.B., S.C., A.F., G.B.P., L.P.B., G.P.).

2. Department of Medicine and Surgery (C.B., L.P.B., G.P.), University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.

3. Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, Dalmine, Italy (S.C.).

4. IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Biostatistics Unit, Milan, Italy (D.S., A.Z.).

5. Department of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Académique Erasme, Belgium (C.D., A.B., J.-L.V.).

6. Department of Statistic and Quantitative Methods (A.Z.), University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.

7. Cardiovascular Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.).

Abstract

Background: Exercise hemodynamics can differentiate heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) from noncardiac dyspnea. However, respiratory pressure swings may impact hemodynamic measurements, potentially leading to misdiagnosis of HFpEF. Moreover, threshold values for abnormal hemodynamic response indicative of HFpEF are not universally accepted. Thus, we sought to evaluate the impact of respiratory pressure swings on hemodynamic data interpretation as well as the concordance among 3 proposed exercise hemodynamic criteria for HFpEF: (1) end-expiratory pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP exp ) ≥25 mm Hg; (2) PAWP exp /cardiac output slope >2 mm Hg/L per minute; and (3) respiratory-averaged (avg) mean pulmonary artery pressure >30 mm Hg, total pulmonary resistance avg >3 WU, PAWP avg ≥20 mm Hg. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with unexplained dyspnea (70% women, 70±9 years) underwent exercise cardiac catheterization. The difference between end-expiratory and averaged hemodynamic values, as well as the concordance among the 3 hemodynamic definitions of HFpEF, were assessed. Results: End-expiratory hemodynamics measurements were higher than values averaged across the respiratory cycle. During exercise, a larger proportion of patients exceeded the threshold of 25 mm Hg for PAWP exp rather than for PAWP avg (70% versus 53%, P <0.01). The concordance of 3/3 HFpEF exercise hemodynamic criteria was recorded in 70% of patients. PAWP exp /cardiac output slope identified HFpEF more frequently than the other 2 criteria (81% versus 64% to 69%), incorporating over 97% of abnormal responses to the latter. Patients with 3/3 positive criteria had worse clinical, gas-exchange, and hemodynamic profiles. Conclusions: Respiratory pressure swings impact on the exercise hemodynamic definitions of HFpEF that provide discordant results in 30% of patients. Equivocal diagnoses of HFpEF might be limited by adopting the most sensitive and inclusive criterion alone (ie, PAWP exp /cardiac output slope).

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3