Blood Pressure and Adverse Events During Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

Author:

Saeed Omar1,Jermyn Rita1,Kargoli Faraj1,Madan Shivank1,Mannem Santhosh1,Gunda Sampath1,Nucci Cecilia1,Farooqui Sarah1,Hassan Syed1,Mclarty Allison1,Bloom Michelle1,Zolty Ronald1,Shin Julia1,D’Alessandro David1,Goldstein Daniel J.1,Patel Snehal R.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (O.S., R.J., F.K., S.M., S.M., S.G., C.N., R.Z., J.S., S.R.P.) and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (D.D’A., D.J.G.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (S.F., S.H., M.B.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (A.M.), Stony Brook University, Long Island, NY.

Abstract

Background— Adverse events (AEs), such as intracranial hemorrhage, thromboembolic event, and progressive aortic insufficiency, create substantial morbidity and mortality during continuous flow left ventricular assist device support yet their relation to blood pressure control is underexplored. Methods and Results— A multicenter retrospective review of patients supported for at least 30 days and ≤18 months by a continuous flow left ventricular assist device from June 2006 to December 2013 was conducted. All outpatient Doppler blood pressure (DOPBP) recordings were averaged up to the time of intracranial hemorrhage, thromboembolic event, or progressive aortic insufficiency. DOPBP was analyzed as a categorical variable grouped as high (>90 mm Hg; n=40), intermediate (80–90 mm Hg; n=52), and controlled (<80 mm Hg; n=31). Cumulative survival free from an AE was calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox hazard ratios were derived. Patients in the high DOPBP group had worse baseline renal function, lower angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker usage during continuous flow left ventricular assist device support, and a more prevalent history of hypertension. Twelve (30%) patients in the high DOPBP group had an AE, in comparison with 7 (13%) patients in the intermediate DOPBP group and only 1 (3%) in the controlled DOPBP group. The likelihood of an AE increased in patients with a high DOPBP (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 16.4 [1.8–147.3]; P =0.012 versus controlled and 2.6 [0.93–7.4]; P =0.068 versus intermediate). Overall, a similar association was noted for the risk of intracranial hemorrhage ( P =0.015) and progressive aortic insufficiency ( P =0.078) but not for thromboembolic event ( P =0.638). Patients with an AE had a higher DOPBP (90±10 mm Hg) in comparison with those without an AE (85±10 mm Hg; P =0.05). Conclusions— In a population at risk, higher DOPBP during continuous flow left ventricular assist device support was significantly associated with a composite of AEs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 69 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3