Calcium channel blockers and clinical outcomes in patients with continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices

Author:

Tie Hongtao12,Li Zhenhan34,Welp Henryk1,Guha Avirup56,Caraballo César78,Deschka Heinz1,Shi Rui9,Zheng Xiaoqing10,Martens Sven1,Sindermann Jürgen1,Chen Dan2,Wu Qingchen2,Martens Sabrina1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University Hospital Muenster Muenster Germany

2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China

3. Department of Endocrinology Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Chongqing China

4. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine University Hospital Muenster Muenster Germany

5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University Augusta GA USA

6. Cardio‐Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology The Ohio State University Medical Center Columbus OH USA

7. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT USA

8. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation New Haven CT USA

9. Department of Critical Care Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

10. University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA USA

Abstract

AbstractAimsCurrent guidelines suggest calcium channel blockers (CCBs) as the second or third option for blood pressure management in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). However, the clinical outcomes of patients with LVAD who receive CCBs remain unclear. Our study aims to analyse the association of CCBs with clinical outcomes in patients after LVAD implantation.Methods and resultsThis is a retrospective analysis based on the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) from 2006 to 2017, and adult patients who were alive with LVAD and CCB treatment information at 6 months after implantation were included. Among 10 717 patients, 1369 received CCBs 6 months after implantation, and there was an increasing trend of CCB use after LVAD. Patients receiving CCB therapy at 6 months had a similar 5 year survival rate to those not receiving CCB [49.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 47.5–51.7% vs. 51.1%, 95% CI: 45.3–56.7%]. In both Cox and competing risk regressions after adjusting for confounding factors, CCB treatment at 6 months after implantation was not associated with long‐term mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 1.03, 95% CI: 0.91–1.17, P = 0.624 and subdistribution HR (SHR): 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95–1.22, P = 0.260]. Consistently, in time‐varying models, CCB treatment was not linked to long‐term mortality (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.87–1.09, P = 0.682 and SHR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.94–1.18, P = 0.359). This null association remained in subgroup analysis according to device strategy and propensity‐matching analyses. Neurological dysfunction, stroke, bleeding, rehospitalization, and renal dysfunction were more likely to occur among those with CCB when compared with those without CCB treatment.ConclusionsIn patients with LVAD, CCB therapy fails to show benefits in long‐term survival and is associated with increased incidences of neurological dysfunction, bleeding, renal dysfunction, and rehospitalization.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3