Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Rashid Muhammad12,Kwok Chun Shing2,Pancholy Samir3,Chugh Sanjay4,Kedev Sasko A.5,Bernat Ivo6,Ratib Karim7,Large Adrian7,Fraser Doug8,Nolan James7,Mamas Mamas A.279

Affiliation:

1. St. Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hospital (NHS) Trust, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, UK

2. Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Keele, Stoke‐on‐Trent, UK

3. The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, The Commonwealth Medical College, Scranton, PA

4. Artemis Hospital, Gurgaon, India

5. University Clinic of Cardiology Skopje, Skopje, Macedonia

6. University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic

7. Royal Stoke Hospital, University Hospital North Midlands Trust, Stoke‐on‐Trent, UK

8. Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK

9. Farr Institute, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, UK

Abstract

Background Radial artery occlusion ( RAO ) may occur posttransradial intervention and limits the radial artery as a future access site, thus precluding its use as an arterial conduit. In this study, we investigate the incidence and factors influencing the RAO in the current literature. Methods and Results We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies of RAO in transradial access. Relevant studies were identified and data were extracted. Data were synthesized by meta‐analysis, quantitative pooling, graphical representation, or by narrative synthesis. A total of 66 studies with 31 345 participants were included in the analysis. Incident RAO ranged between <1% and 33% and varied with timing of assessment of radial artery patency (incidence of RAO within 24 hours was 7.7%, which decreased to 5.5% at >1 week follow‐up). The most efficacious measure in reducing RAO was higher dose of heparin, because lower doses of heparin were associated with increased RAO (risk ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.76), whereas shorter compression times also reduced RAO (risk ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.05–1.50). Several factors were found to be associated with RAO including age, sex, sheath size, and diameter of radial artery, but these factors were not consistent across all studies. Conclusions RAO is a common complication of transradial access. Maintenance of radial patency should be an integral part of all procedures undertaken through the radial approach. High‐dose heparin along with shorter compression times and patent hemostasis is recommended in reducing RAO .

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3