Transradial artery access for carotid artery stenting: A pooled analysis

Author:

Batista Sávio1ORCID,Oliveira Leonardo de Barros2,Sousa Marcelo Porto1ORCID,Pinheiro Agostinho C3,Borges Jordana4,Santana Laís5,Bertani Raphael6,Andreão Filipi Fim1,Simões Adria7,Almeida Filho José Alberto8

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2. Faculty of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

3. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

4. Independent Researcher

5. Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Geral de Palmas, Tocantins, Brazil

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Municipal Hospital Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Introduction Carotid artery stenting (CAS) through transradial access (TRA) is emerging as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, the current evidence base is limited, mainly comprising single-center studies. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the safety and effectiveness of TRA for CAS, providing evidence to support clinical decisions. Methods We conducted searches on PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases, including studies on TRA for CAS. Studies with fewer than 20 patients, non-primary outcomes, and non-full-text articles were excluded. Results We analyzed 14 studies involving 1,166 patients who underwent CAS via TRA. Procedural success rate was high in 13 studies, with a 95% rate (95% CI; 92%–98%). Crossover to TFA access was observed in 12 studies at 6% (95% CI: 3%–9%). Transradial access failure was reported in four studies, with a rate of 0% (95% CI: 0%–0%). Cannulation failure resulted in a rate of 4% (95% CI: 2%–7%). Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion (ARAO) occurred at a rate of 2% based on eight studies (95% CI: 0%–5%). Forearm hematoma was reported in 10 studies, with an occurrence of 1% (95% CI: 0%–2%). Cerebral vascular attacks (CAV) within 30 days were assessed in 13 studies, indicating a 2% occurrence (95% CI: 1%–2%). Conclusion The findings suggest that TRA for CAS yields promising outcomes with high success rates and low complication rates. Further research should focus on randomized controlled trials and long-term outcomes to validate and extend findings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3