Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection

Author:

Rubin Mark N.1ORCID,Shah Ruchir2,Devlin Thomas2,Youn Teddy S.3,Waters Michael F.3ORCID,Volpi John J.4,Stayman Aaron5,Douville Colleen M.5,Lowenkopf Ted6,Tsivgoulis Georgios7ORCID,Alexandrov Andrei V.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, IL (M.N.R.).

2. CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN (R.S., T.D.).

3. Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ (T.S.Y., M.F.W.).

4. Houston Methodist Research Institute, TX (J.J.V.).

5. Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA (A.S., C.M.D.).

6. Providence Brain and Spine Institute, Portland, OR (T.L.).

7. Second Department of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Greece (G.T.).

8. Department of Neurology, Banner University Hospital, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix (A.V.A.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Right to left shunt (RLS), including patent foramen ovale, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. RLS/patent foramen ovale diagnosis is made by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography, which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD), which is noninvasive and accurate but scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-arm device clinical trial of robot-assisted TCD (raTCD) versus TTE for RLS diagnosis at 6 clinical sites in patients who presented with an event suspicious for embolic cerebrovascular ischemia from October 6, 2020 to October 20, 2021. raTCD was performed with standard TCD bubble study technique. TTE bubble study was performed per local standards. The primary outcome was rate of RLS detection by raTCD versus TTE. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were enrolled, 129 evaluable (intent to scan) and 121 subjects had complete data per protocol. In the intent to scan cohort, mean age was 60±15 years, 47% were women, and all qualifying events were diagnosed as ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. raTCD was positive for RLS in 82 subjects (64%) and TTE was positive in 26 (20%; absolute difference 43.4% [95% CI, 35.2%–52.0%]; P <0.001). On prespecified secondary analysis, large RLS was detected by raTCD in 35 subjects (27%) versus 13 (10%) by TTE (absolute difference 17.0% [95% CI, 11.5%–24.5%]; P <0.001). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: raTCD was safe and ≈3 times more likely to diagnose RLS than TTE. TTE completely missed or underdiagnosed two thirds of large shunts diagnosed by raTCD. The raTCD device, used by health professionals with no prior TCD training, may allow providers to achieve the known sensitivity of TCD for RLS and patent foramen ovale detection without the need for an experienced operator to perform the test. Pending confirmatory studies, TCD appears to be the superior screen for RLS compared with TTE (funded by NeuraSignal). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04604015.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3