Domain-Specific Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Therapies Promoting Stroke Recovery: A Suggested Blueprint

Author:

Cramer Steven C.1ORCID,Lin David J.234ORCID,Finklestein Seth P.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles; and California Rehabilitation Institute, Los Angeles (S.C.C.).

2. Department of Neurology, Stroke Service (D.J.L., S.P.F.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

3. Division of Neurocritical Care, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (D.J.L), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

4. Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Providence, RI (D.J.L.).

Abstract

Different deficits recover to different degrees and with different time courses after stroke, indicating that plasticity differs across the brain’s neural systems after stroke. To capture these differences, domain-specific outcome measures have received increased attention. Such measures have potential advantages over global outcome scales, which combine recovery across many domains into a single score and so blur the ability to capture individual measures of stroke recovery. Use of a global end point to rate disability can overlook substantial recovery in specific domains, such as motor or language, and may not differentiate between good and poor recovery for specific neurological domains. In light of these points, a blueprint is proposed for using domain-specific outcome measures in stroke recovery trials. Key steps include selecting a domain in the context of preclinical data, picking a domain-specific clinical trial end point, anchoring inclusion criteria to this end point, scoring this end point both before and after treatment, and then pursuing regulatory approval on the basis of the domain-specific results. This blueprint is intended to foster clinical trials that, by using domain-specific end points, are able to demonstrate favorable results in clinical trials of therapies that promote stroke recovery.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Reference24 articles.

1. The Case for Modality-Specific Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Stroke Recovery-Promoting Agents

2. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce

3. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). Accessed January 11 2023. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health.

4. Evolution of the Modified Rankin Scale and Its Use in Future Stroke Trials

5. Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3