Comparison of flow and velocity during dynamic autoregulation testing in humans.

Author:

Newell D W1,Aaslid R1,Lam A1,Mayberg T S1,Winn H R1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

Abstract

We compared relative changes in middle cerebral artery velocity and internal carotid artery flow during autoregulation testing to test the validity of using transcranial Doppler recordings of middle cerebral artery velocity to evaluate cerebral autoregulation in humans. Seven human volunteers had dynamic autoregulation tested during surgical procedures that included exposure of the internal carotid artery. The mean arterial blood pressure and middle cerebral artery velocity spectral outline (Vmax), using transcranial Doppler, and ipsilateral internal carotid artery flow, using an electromagnetic flowmeter, were continuously and simultaneously recorded during transient sharp decreases in blood pressure that were induced by rapid deflation of thigh blood pressure cuffs. The resulting responses of velocity in the middle cerebral artery and flow in the internal carotid artery were compared. Moderate decreases in blood pressure evoked responses in cerebral autoregulation. There were no significant (P = .97) differences between the responses in middle cerebral artery velocity and internal carotid artery flow to the blood pressure decreases. Relative changes in Vmax accurately reflect relative changes in internal carotid artery flow during dynamic autoregulation testing in humans. Therefore, alterations in middle cerebral artery diameter do not occur to the extent that they introduce a significant error in making these comparisons.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 414 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3