Guideline‐Directed Medical Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Midrange Ejection Fraction: A Patient‐Pooled Analysis From the KorHF and KorAHF Registries

Author:

Choi Ki Hong1,Choi Jin‐Oh1,Jeon Eun‐Seok1,Lee Ga Yeon1,Choi Dong‐Ju2,Lee Hae‐Young3,Kim Jae‐Joong4,Chae Shung Chull5,Baek Sang Hong6,Kang Seok‐Min7,Yoo Byung‐Su8,Kim Kye Hun9,Cho Myeong‐Chan10,Park Hyun‐Young11,Oh Byung‐Hee3

Affiliation:

1. Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine Seoul Korea

2. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam Korea

3. Department of Internal Medicine Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea

4. University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea

5. Kyungpook National University College of Medicine Daegu Korea

6. The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea

7. Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Korea

8. Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine Wonju Korea

9. Heart Research Center of Chonnam National University Gwangju Korea

10. Chungbuk National University College of Medicine Cheongju Korea

11. National Institute of Health Osong Korea

Abstract

Background Although current guidelines now define heart failure with midrange ejection fraction ( HF mr EF ) as HF with a left ventricular EF of 40% to 49%, there are limited data on response to guideline‐directed medical therapy in patients with HF mr EF . The current study aimed to evaluate the association between β‐blocker, renin‐angiotensin system blocker ( RASB ), or aldosterone antagonist ( AA ) treatment with clinical outcome in patients with HF mr EF . Methods and Results We performed a patient‐level pooled analysis on 1144 patients with HF mr EF who were hospitalized for acute HF from the Kor HF (Korean Heart Failure) and Kor AHF (Korean Acute Heart Failure) registries. The study population was divided between use of β‐blocker, RASB , or AA to evaluate the guideline‐directed medical therapy in patients with HF mr EF . Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score matching and inverse‐probability‐weighted methods, were performed. The use of β‐blocker in the discharge group showed significantly lower rates of all‐cause mortality compared with those who did not use a β‐blocker (β‐blocker versus no β‐blocker, 30.7% versus 38.2%; hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% confidence interval, 0.615–0.934; P =0.009). Similarly, the RASB use in the discharge group was associated with the lower risk of mortality compared with no use of RASB ( RASB versus no RASB , 31.9% versus 38.1%; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.618–0.946; P =0.013). However, there was no significant difference in all‐cause mortality between AA and no AA in the discharge group ( AA versus no AA , 34.2% versus 34.0%; hazard ratio, 1.063; 95% confidence interval, 0.858–1.317; P =0.578). Multiple sensitivity analyses showed similar trends. Conclusions For treatment of acute HFmrEF after hospitalization, β‐blocker and RASB therapies on discharge were associated with reduced risk of all‐cause mortality. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01389843.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3