Triage of 5 Noncontrast Computed Tomography Markers and Spot Sign for Outcome Prediction After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Besides the established spot sign (SS) in computed tomography angiography (CTA), there is growing evidence that different imaging markers in noncontrast CT offer great value for outcome prediction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, it is unclear how the concurrent presence of each sign independently contributes to the predictive power of poor outcome. We, therefore, aimed to clarify the predictive value of 5 recently published noncontrast CT parameters (blend sign, black hole sign, island sign, hematoma heterogeneity, and hypodensities) and the established SS in 1 consecutive series of patients with ICH. Methods— Retrospective study of patients with ICH at 2 German tertiary stroke centers; inclusion criteria were (1) spontaneous ICH and (2) noncontrast CT and CTA performed on admission within 6 hours after onset of symptoms. We defined a binary outcome (good outcome [modified Rankin Scale score of ≤3] versus poor outcome [modified Rankin Scale score of >3]) at discharge. The predictive value of each sign was assessed in univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Results— Of 201 patients with spontaneous ICH, 28 (13.9%) presented with black hole sign, 38 (18.9%) with blend sign, 120 (59.7%) with hypodensities, 97 (48.3%) with heterogeneous densities, 53 with island sign (26.4%), and 45 (22.4%) with SS. In univariable logistic regression, higher hematoma volume ( P <0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage ( P =0.002), and the presence of black hole sign/blend sign/hypodensities/island sign/SS/heterogeneous density (all P <0.001) on admission CT were associated with poor outcome. Multivariable analysis confirmed intraventricular hemorrhage (odds ratio, 2.20; P =0.025), higher hematoma volume (odds ratio, 1.02 per mL; P <0.019), the presence of hypodensities (odds ratio, 2.47; P =0.018), and SS (odds ratio, 12.22; P <0.001) as independent predictors of poor outcome. Conclusions— This study demonstrates the degree of interaction between 5 recent noncontrast CT imaging markers and SS and their individual contribution for outcome prediction in patients with ICH. Of the CT variables indicating poor outcome SS on CTA and hypodensities were the most reliable outcome predictors.