Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Author:

Chan Yi‐Hsin123,Lee Hsin‐Fu124,Wang Chun‐Li12,Chang Shang‐Hung125,Yeh Chih‐Hsin5,Chao Tze‐Fan67,Yeh Yung‐Hsin12,Chen Shih‐Ann67,Kuo Chi‐Tai12

Affiliation:

1. The Cardiovascular Department Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan Taiwan

2. College of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan

3. Microscopy Core Laboratory Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan Taiwan

4. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences College of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan

5. Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taoyuan Taiwan

6. Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan

7. Institute of Clinical Medicine, and Cardiovascular Research Center National Yang‐Ming University Taipei Taiwan

Abstract

Background The ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) evaluated rivaroxaban (20/15 mg/d) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. A separate trial, J‐ ROCKET AF (Japanese ROCKET AF), compared rivaroxaban (15/10 mg/d) and warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation. Data about rivaroxaban following J‐ ROCKET AF criteria compared with warfarin and ROCKET AF dosage were limited. Methods and Results This retrospective study used medical data from a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan that included 3162 patients taking rivaroxaban. Among 2320 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ( eGFR ) ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , 384 and 1936 patients followed the ROCKET AF (20 mg/d) and J‐ ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. Among 842 patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , 422 and 420 patients followed the ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) and J‐ ROCKET AF (10 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. A total of 2053 patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin were identified. Rivaroxaban following either ROCKET AF or J‐ ROCKET AF dosage criteria was associated with a comparable risk of thromboembolism but a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. For patients with an eGFR ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , risks of clinical events did not differ significantly between the 2 dosage criteria of rivaroxaban. For patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , the ROCKET AF dosage was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared with the J‐ ROCKET AF dosage (hazard ratio, 2.70; P =0.0445) without significant differences regarding the risk of ischemic events. Conclusions In Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, the J‐ ROCKET AF dosage was as effective as the ROCKET AF dosage irrespective of renal function. The risk of major bleeding was lower with the J‐ ROCKET AF dosage in patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban following either dosage criteria was effective and even safer.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3