Blood Pressure Intervention and Control in SPRINT

Author:

Cushman William C.1ORCID,Ringer Robert J.2,Rodriguez Carlos J.3ORCID,Evans Gregory W.4,Bates Jeffrey T.5ORCID,Cutler Jeffrey A.6,Hawfield Amret7,Kitzman Dalane W.8,Nasrallah Ilya M.9,Oparil Suzanne10ORCID,Nord John11,Papademetriou Vasilios12,Servilla Karen13,Van Buren Peter14,Whelton Paul K.15ORCID,Whittle Jeff16ORCID,Wright Jackson T.17ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, and Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis (W.C.C.).

2. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM (R.J.R.).

3. Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (C.J.R.).

4. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science (G.W.E.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

5. Medical Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (J.T.B.).

6. Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (J.A.C.).

7. Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology (A.H.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

8. Department of Internal Medicine, Sections on Cardiovascular Medicine and Geriatrics (D.W.K.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

9. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (I.M.N.).

10. Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (S.O.).

11. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine and Internal Medicine Service, George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City (J.N.).

12. Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.P.).

13. Research Service, New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Albuquerque (K.S.).

14. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, TX (P.V.B.).

15. Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA (P.K.W.).

16. Division of Medicine, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI (J.W.).

17. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, OH (J.T.W.).

Abstract

Background: The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) demonstrated reductions in major cardiovascular disease events and mortality with an intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal intervention. However, a detailed description of the blood pressure intervention, antihypertensive medication usage, blood pressure levels, and rates and predictors of blood pressure control has not been reported previously. Methods: Hypertensive participants (n=9361) 50 years and older with elevated cardiovascular disease risk were randomized 1:1 to SBP goal <120 mm Hg or SBP goal <140 mm Hg. Guideline-recommended antihypertensive medications and dosing were provided at no cost. Intensive group participants were started on at least 2 medications, and medications were adjusted monthly until SBP goal was achieved, if feasible. Standard group participants were treated to achieve SBP 135 to 139 mm Hg. Results: Baseline blood pressure (median±interquartile range) was 138±19/78±16 mm Hg. For intensive group participants, percent at goal rose from 8.9% at baseline to 52.4% at 6 months and average antihypertensive medications rose from 2.2 to 2.7; SBP was <120 mm Hg in 61.6% and <130 mm Hg in 80.0% at their final visit. For the standard group participants, percent at goal rose from 53.0% at baseline to 68.6% at 6 months, while antihypertensive medications fell from 1.9 to 1.8. From 6 to 36 months, median SBP was stable at 119±14 mm Hg for intensive and 136±15 mm Hg for standard participants, with stable numbers of medications. Few predictors of SBP control were found in multiple regression models. Conclusions: These results may inform and help replicate the benefits of SPRINT in clinical practice. Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3