Affiliation:
1. Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
2. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
3. Renal Section, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah
4. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
5. Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
6. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee
Abstract
Background
In a post hoc analysis, we examined whether postrandomization diuretics use can explain and/or mediate the beneficial effects of intensive systolic BP lowering on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).
Methods
SPRINT was a randomized, controlled trial of 9361 participants comparing the effects of intensive (systolic BP target <120 mm Hg) versus standard (systolic BP target <140 mm Hg) BP control on a primary composite cardiovascular end point in participants aged 50 years or older with systolic BP of 130–180 mm Hg. In time-varying multivariable Cox analyses, we assessed hazard ratios (HRs) of cardiovascular end points and all-cause mortality in participants on thiazide type, loop and/or potassium (K) sparing, or no diuretics. We also conducted mediation analysis to formally assess the role of diuretics in the effects of intensive systolic BP lowering.
Results
At baseline, diuretics were prescribed in 46% and 48% of participants in standard and intensive systolic BP-lowering groups, respectively, and in 46% and 74% in the corresponding groups during the trial. The lower risk of cardiovascular end points in the intensive group (HR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.89) persisted after adjustment for postrandomization time-varying diuretics use (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89). Across the entire study population, time-varying diuretics use was not associated with cardiovascular end points (compared with no diuretics, HR for thiazide type, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.10, and loop/K sparing, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.73). However, thiazide-type diuretics were associated with lower risk of cardiovascular end points in the intensive (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.85) but not in the standard (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.39) group. In mediation analysis, HRs for total effect, direct effect (not mediated through diuretics use), and indirect effect (mediated through diuretics) of the intervention on cardiovascular end points were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.79), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.81), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.10), respectively. The results were largely similar for all-cause mortality.
Conclusions
The favorable effects of intensive systolic BP lowering on cardiovascular end points and all-cause mortality in SPRINT were independent of and not mediated by time-varying diuretics use. However, thiazide-type diuretics use associated with benefit if intensive systolic BP lowering was targeted.
Funder
NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
Office of Rural Health
National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases
National Institute of Aging
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference21 articles.
1. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies;Lewington;Lancet,2002
2. A method for distinguishing salt-sensitive from non-salt-sensitive forms of human and experimental hypertension;Kimura;Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens.,1993
3. Roles of the kidneys and fluid volumes in arterial pressure regulation and hypertension;Guyton;Chin J Physiol.,1989
4. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines;Whelton;Circulation.,2018
5. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8);James;JAMA.,2014