Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Author:

Layland Jamie12,Rauhalammi Samuli2,Lee Matthew M. Y.12,Ahmed Nadeem12,Carberry Jaclyn2,Teng Yue May Vannesa2,Watkins Stuart1,McComb Christie2,Mangion Kenneth12,McClure John D.2,Carrick David12,O'Donnell Anna1,Sood Arvind3,McEntegart Margaret1,Oldroyd Keith G.1,Radjenovic Aleksandra2,Berry Colin12

Affiliation:

1. West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom

2. BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

3. Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. Methods and Results We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted short tau inversion recovery [T2W‐ STIR ]) magnetic resonance imaging methods for imaging the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in 73 patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (mean age 57±10 years, 78% male) at 3.0‐T magnetic resonance imaging within 6.5±3.5 days of invasive management. The infarct‐related territory was identified independently using a combination of angiographic, ECG , and clinical findings. The presence and extent of infarction was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement imaging (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg). The extent of acutely injured myocardium was independently assessed with native T1, T2, and T2W‐ STIR methods. The mean infarct size was 5.9±8.0% of left ventricular mass. The infarct zone T1 and T2 times were 1323±68 and 57±5 ms, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies of T1 and T2 mapping for identification of the infarct‐related artery were similar ( P =0.125), and both were superior to T2W‐ STIR ( P <0.001). The extent of myocardial injury (percentage of left ventricular volume) estimated with T1 (15.8±10.6%) and T2 maps (16.0±11.8%) was similar ( P =0.838) and moderately well correlated ( r =0.82, P <0.001). Mean extent of acute injury estimated with T2W‐ STIR (7.8±11.6%) was lower than that estimated with T1 ( P <0.001) or T2 maps ( P <0.001). Conclusions In patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping have higher diagnostic performance than T2W‐ STIR for identifying the infarct‐related artery. Compared with conventional STIR , T1 and T2 maps have superior value to inform diagnosis and revascularization planning in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02073422.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3